admin_nupur

सर्वोच्च न्यायालय, उच्च न्यायालय और जिला न्यायालयों के लिए कानूनी दस्तावेज़ों का प्रारूपण – प्रमुख अंतर जो हर वकील को पता होने चाहिए प्रारूपण वकालत की रीढ़ है। कानूनी दस्तावेज़ों का दृष्टिकोण, संरचना और गहराई उस अदालत के आधार पर काफ़ी भिन्न होती है जिसमें मामला प्रस्तुत किया जा रहा है। यहाँ एक त्वरित तुलनात्मक […]

⚖️ आपराधिक कानून में ज़मानत के प्रकार, ऐतिहासिक केस कानूनों के साथ ⚖️ आपराधिक कानून में, ज़मानत केवल हिरासत से रिहाई नहीं है – यह स्वतंत्रता के मौलिक अधिकार की सुरक्षा है। सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने बार-बार इस बात पर ज़ोर दिया है कि “ज़मानत नियम है, जेल अपवाद है।” ज़मानत के प्रमुख प्रकारों को केस

⚖️ 7 LANDMARK JUDGMENTS ON DEATH PENALTY IN INDIA 👉 Jagmohan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1973)Facts: Jagmohan Singh was sentenced to death for murder. He challenged the constitutionality of the death penalty, saying it violated Articles 14, 19, and 21.Issue: Whether the death penalty was unconstitutional for giving wide discretion to judges without

Dishonour of Cheque–Amendment of Complaint Amendment which does not cause prejudice to the accused can be allowed by the Trial Court (A) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.138–Dishonour of Cheque–Amendment of Complaint–Description of Goods Supplied–Amendment was moved at a stage when after summons being issued to the respondents, the chief examination of the complainant had concluded

NDPS–Independent Witness Non Joining of Local Person–Rather a person who had a shop near the police station was included–Serious doubt about whether the witness was truly independent–AcquittalNDPS–Search and Seizure–Form No. 29 shows that the samples were numbered 1 to 4 but these numbers do not appear in the recovery memo or rukka–Acquittal (A) Narcotic Drugs

Landmark judgment of Supreme court on appreciation of evidence of handwriting expertWe will first consider the argument, a State argument often heard, particularly in criminal courts, that the opinion-evidence of a handwriting expert should not be acted upon without substantial corroboration. We shall presently point out how the argument cannot be justified on principle or

✅ Test Identification Parade (TIP) 📌 Statutory Basis 📌 Principles of TIPRajesh v. State of Haryana, 2020 SC 📌 Necessity & Purpose of TIP 📌 Whether TIP is Essential? 📌 Precautions & Procedure 📌 Delay in TIP 📌 Evidentiary Value of TIP 📌 Modern Identification Methods1. DNA IdentificationKathi David Raju v. State of A.P, 2019

🏛️ PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT ALKA SARIN J Motor Vehicle Act, Compensation – Enhancement of compensation awarded by Tribunal – Tribunal failed to consider future prospects for the deceased aged 31 years at the time of the accident – 40% addition towards future prospects allowed – Compensation under conventional heads like loss of estate, funeral

स्त्रीधन सूची—अदालत में प्रस्तुत न किए जाने पर दोष-मुक्ति का आदेश बरकरार—विवाह के समय दिए गए कथित उपहार मात्र पत्नी तथा उसके पिता के अप्रमाणित कथनों पर आधारित पाए गए—नियम 2 के अंतर्गत आवश्यक उपहार सूची पत्नी द्वारा प्रस्तुत नहीं की गई—प्रमाण के अभाव में गबन/दुर्विनियोग (Misappropriation) का आरोप सिद्ध नहीं हो सका—न्यायालय द्वारा पारित

Court Fee. When land revenue is paid on property, Court fee to be paid at 30 times of land revenue fixed on land If the suit is filed for the cancellation of instrument. Rajendra Prasad Yadav V. Ravindra Naath – 2014 (122) RD 507