Uncategorized

SARANGA ANILKUMAR AGGARWAL VERSUS BHAVESH DHIRAJLAL SHETH & ORS. [CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4048 OF 2024]BENCH: JUSTICES VIKRAM NATH AND PRASANNA B. VARALE COURT: SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT DATE: March 4, 2025 In a significant development, the Supreme Court ruled that an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 does not apply […]

Summaries of the Cases: Criminal cases with a predominantly civil nature, particularly those arising from commercial transactions, matrimonial relationships, or family disputes, should be quashed if the parties have fully resolved their disputes. The NI Act, 1881, prescribes a 30-day limitation (Sec. 142) to initiate proceedings under Sec. 138. Summary trial procedures are mandated (Sec.

संविधान के अनुच्छेद 19 और 21 के तहत मौलिक अधिकारों को राज्य या उसके साधनों के अलावा अन्य व्यक्तियों के विरुद्ध भी लागू किया जा सकता हैकेस का नाम : कौशल किशोर बनाम उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य एवं अन्य।न्यायालय : भारत का माननीय सर्वोच्च न्यायालय (‘ सुप्रीम कोर्ट ‘) अवलोकन : भारतीय संविधान के अनुच्छेद 19

धारा 245(1) व धारा 245(2), दं०प्र०सं०—उन्मोचन प्रार्थना-पत्र—धारा 244, दं०प्र०सं० के तहत दर्ज साक्ष्य पर्याप्त ना होने की स्थिति में मजिस्ट्रेट द्वारा धारा 245(1) के अन्तर्गत आरोपी को उन्मोचित किया जा सकता है—जबकि धारा 245(2) की विधिक योजना पूर्णतः भिन्न है—धारा 245(2) के अंतर्गत प्रयुक्त शब्दावली “मुकद्दमे के किसी पूर्वतर प्रक्रम पर” के अनुसार मजिस्ट्रेट द्वारा

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Abdul Wahid & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan Criminal Appeal No. 722 of 2012 Judgement Date 28-02-2025 Pankaj Mithal, Ujjal Bhuyan JJ HEADNOTE WITH FULL TEXT JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL LAWS Murder – Evidence of PW1, an eyewitness and the informant in the case – His evidence suffers from severe inconsistencies, contradictions

Sukhdev Singh v. Sukhbir Kaur (SC): 2025 INSC 197 = (2025) pm A. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (25 of 1955), Section 11, 25 — Void marriage – Maintenance to spouse – Permanent alimony – Right of — A spouse whose marriage has been declared void u/s 11 of the 1955 Act is entitled to seek

Basic order not challenged, the consequential order too cannot be challenged . Stamp Act. When the order imposing the stamp duty and penalty has not been challenged,subsequent order to recover this amount can’t be challenged. [para-11] Sangita Rani v. State of U.P2019 [144] RD 204 FB

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IMPORTANT JUDGMENT Surinder Dogra v. State Through Director Cbi Criminal Appeal No(s). 1020 Of 2022 Date of Decision:- 21-02-2025 Sudhanshu Dhulia, Prashant Kumar Mishra JJ HEADNOTE WITH FULL JUDGMENT CRIMINAL LAWS Ranbir Penal Code (RPC) of 1989 Sections 420, 468, 471 – Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 5 (1)