Uncategorized

मध्य प्रदेश उच्च न्यायालय ने दस्तावेजों में हेराफेरी करने और भूमि अधिग्रहण मुआवजा राशि से 5 करोड़ रुपये से अधिक की हेराफेरी करने के आरोपी एक सरकारी कंप्यूटर ऑपरेटर को ज़मानत देने से इनकार कर दिया। न्यायालय ने कहा कि आरोपी ने “आधिकारिक अभिलेखों में हेराफेरी करने के लिए अपने पद का दुरुपयोग किया” और […]

Supreme Court acquits trio in policeman’s murder, citing flawed evidence chain. The Supreme Court acquitted the accused because the prosecution failed to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence. Key elements like motive, extra-judicial confessions, and recovery of weapons were deemed unreliable, and the presence of the deceased’s body at the accused’s house alone was

Supreme Court rules borrowers lose right to redeem property once auction notice is published. The Supreme Court held that a borrower’s right to redeem a mortgaged property under the SARFAESI Act ends on the date the auction notice is published, not when the sale is completed. The Court clarified that the 2016 amendment to Section

Supreme Court: The court may award maintenance to wife up to 25% of husband’s income and to child 15% of husband’s incomeA sum of Rs. 250/- per month for the maintenance of the wife of a person occupying the position of the appellant cannot be said to err on the liberal side. The High Court

🏛️PATNA HIGH COURT BIBEK CHAUDHURI J Section 302 IPC and Arms Act Section 27 Conviction based on defective investigation Prosecution’s failure to seize weapon of offence, obtain ballistic expert’s opinion, and examine critical evidence like blood-stained earth, wearing apparel, and pellets recovered from the deceased’s body – Held, such lapses amount to no investigation, and

🏛️ SUPREME COURT OF INDIA N.V. ANJARIA, J. NI ACT Sections 138, 141, 142, Proviso (b) Dishonour of Cheque Demand Notice Validity Requirement of notice to demand the “said amount of money’ “Said amount of money’ refers to the cheque amount itself — Demand for an amount different from the cheque amount invalidates the notice

✅ Case Law for Preamble with One Line Explanation ◾ 1. Re: Berubari Union 1960 – SC held Preamble is not a part of the Constitution. ◾ 2. Golaknath v. State of Punjab 1967 – Discussed importance of Fundamental Rights, hinted at Preamble’s guiding role. ◾ 3. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala 1973 –

🏛️ PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT HEADLINES ENGLISH AND HINDI VIKAS BAHL, J Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, Eviction petition – Relationship of landlord and tenant – Held, in an eviction petition, the burden to prove the relationship of landlord and tenant lies upon the petitioner filing the eviction petition – Framing the