Uncategorized

ILR 2010 KAR 1197KARNATAKA HIGH COURT Smt Karisiddamma and Others vs. Smt Sanna Kenchamma* 📌CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 – ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 – Grant of Temporary Injunction under – Subsequent Interlocutory Application filed seeking police protection to enjoy the suit schedule property – Direction issued to the jurisdictional Police to give

एस.125(4) सीआरपीसी | बिना किसी उचित कारण के पति से दूर रहने वाली पत्नी भरण-पोषण की हकदार नहीं: झारखंड हाईकोर्ट ⚪ एक कानूनी घटनाक्रम में, रांची स्थित झारखंड हाईकोर्ट ने एक मामले में भरण-पोषण आदेश को पलट दिया है, जो भारत में वैवाहिक विवादों और भरण-पोषण कानूनों की जटिलताओं पर प्रकाश डालता है। ⚫ अमित

M/s. Brahmaputra Concrete Pipe Industries Etc. Vs. The Assam State Electricity Board and Ors. [Miscellaneous Application (Civil) No. 2045 of 2022] [Curative Petition (Civil) Diary No. 23828 of 2020] [Review Petition (Civil) No. 789 of 2019] [Civil Appeal No. 8450 of 2016] [Miscellaneous Application (Civil) Nos. 2046, 2047, 2048 and 2050 of 2022] [Curative Petition

2021 CRI. L. J. 655AIROnline 2020 AP 74(ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT) Thamala Gunnayya Pandayya v. State of A.P. Criminal Appeal No.-910 of 2014,D.24- 11-2020 📌Penal Code (45 of 1860), S. 302 Evidence Act (1 of 1872), Ss. 3, 8 – Murder Circumstantial evidence Accused persons allegedly committed murder of deceased Witnesses, brother and cousin sister