admin_nupur

परक्राम्य लिखित अधिनियम, 1881—धारा 138—चैक का अनादरण—दोषमुक्ति का आदेश—व्यक्तिगत स्वामी द्वारा शिकायत—प्रवर्तनीयता—जहाँ शिकायत व्यक्तिगत रूप से व्यक्ति के नाम से दायर की गई हो न कि प्रोपराइटर फर्म के नाम से एवं यह संतोषजनक रूप से सिद्ध नहीं किया गया हो कि परिवादी उस प्रोपराइटर फर्म का एकल स्वामी है, ऐसी स्थिति में परिवादी को […]

Landmark and most appropriately timed ruling by SC .it will prevent the large scale cyber cheating under digital arrest

“Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Educationists in Protest Case” The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against Manchu Mohan Babu and Manchu Vishnu Vardhan Babu, ruling that their peaceful protest did not violate IPC or Police Act provisions. The Court held the allegations lacked essential ingredients of the offences charged. Court:Supreme Court of India Case:Manchu

Can the defendant plead that will is suspicious due to the exclusion of siblings if siblings have not raised that issue?TESTAMENTARY COURT: 24.A testamentary court is not a court of suspicion but that of conscience. It has to consider the relevant materials instead of adopting an ethical reasoning. A mere exclusion of either brother or

What is difference between transfer deed and transfer of property by will?A Will differs from a deed in the following respects: (i) a deed operates eo instanti, i.e., from the date of its execution; a Will comes into operation on the death of the testator; (ii) a deed is ordinarily irrevocable, unless there is an

Important Judgement |Dying Declaration…. The Apex court provided a comprehensive analysis of the evidentiary value of the dying declaration. The court made several important observations regarding the same while upholding the conviction of the appellant. Referring to precedents, the Court summarised the principles relating to dying declaration as follows: (i) it cannot be laid down

How to appreciate evidence if son is claiming that his mother had no earnings and is holding immovable property as benamidar of his father? Crucial question which is to be answered in the present appeal is whether the transaction i.e. the purchase of suit property under registered deed of sale dated 20.01.1970 by Lila is