Crpc की धारा 156- =>Crpc की धारा 165 मे अन्वेषण के बारे बताती है। अन्वेषण का मतलब विवेचना कर साक्ष्य प्राप्त करना होता है। अन्वेषण सिर्फ पुलिस अधिकारी द्वारा किया जाता है अगर पुलिस किसी मामले मे विवेचना नही करती तो वह उसका करण मजिस्ट्रेट को बताएँ गी जब crpc 173(2) के तहत रिपोर्ट न्यायालय […]

Legal News (12.06.2023)

÷÷÷÷÷÷ Legal Update ÷÷÷÷÷ 🅾️अग्रिम जमानत आवेदन दायर करने के लिए हाईकोर्ट या सेशन कोर्ट चुनने के विवेक को प्रावधानों की संकीर्ण व्याख्या द्वारा प्रतिबंधित नहीं किया जा सकता: दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट ====+====+====+====+==== ⬛दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट ने कहा कि अग्रिम जमानत याचिका दायर करने के लिए हाईकोर्ट या निचली अदालत में से किसी एक को चुनने के

Ravinder and Ors. Vs. Gram Panchayat, Damla and Ors. The interim injunction order can be vacated or modified if the order has been obtained on the basis of false facts or the circumstances have changed or it is causing undue hardship or the plaintiff is misusing the order or it was granted without notice to

2016 (5) KCCR 762KARNATAKA HIGH COURT(KALABURAGI BENCH) Mareppa Bellappa Sandimani and OthersVersusState through Chittapur Police Station Criminal Appeal No. 3515 of 2010, decided on 28.7.2016 ↗️📌PENAL CODE, 1860 Sections 147, 148, 448, 323, 324, 326, 504, 506 and 307 readwith Section 149-Acquittal-Delay in lodging complaint Inconsistencies in evidence of injured witnesses- Doctor deposing that there

2016 (5) KCCR 975 (DB)KARNATAKA HIGH COURT SiddarajuVersusMurthy and Another Regular First Appeal No. 874 of 2013 (PAR), decided on 31.5.2016 ↗️📌HINDU LAW-Suit for partition-Mother selling her self- Required property in favour of one son-Not assailing during her life time-Khata effected in favour of purchaser-son-Also paying taxes Other son living in same property-He cannot be

Sec. 9—Commercial Courts Act, Sec. 10—Interim measures—To deposit the amount of performance bank guarantees pertaining to purchase order The order(s) which may be passed by the Commercial Court in an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 is basically and mainly by way of interim measure. It may be true that in a

Citation:AIR 2022 SC 5058 O.14, R. 2(2)(b)—Preliminary issue—Limitation — Now, we will consider the first question: ‗whether the issue of limitation can be determined as a preliminary issue under Order XIV, Rule 2, CPC‘. It is no longer res integra. In the decision in Mongin Realty and Build Well Private Limited vs. Manik Sethi, 7

Union of India & Ors. Vs. A. B. P. Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. [Civil Appeal No(s). 986 of 2011] S. Ravindra Bhat, J. 1. This civil appeal arises from a judgment1 of the Calcutta High Court which held the withdrawal of a customs notification invalid. I 2. ABP Pvt Ltd (“assessee/respondent”) in October 2003, imported