Komal Krishan Arora & Ors. v/s Sandeep Kumar & Ors…

Supreme Court upholds Father’s custody of son, slams mother’s “deceptive conduct” The Supreme Court ruled that the interim custody of the minor son, Master K, shall remain with the father, considering his suitability as a natural guardian and the mother’s failure to act in the child’s welfare by concealing his whereabouts and violating court orders. […]

Komal Krishan Arora & Ors. v/s Sandeep Kumar & Ors… Read More »

Rajmuni v/s State Civil Supplier MAC 1183/16 29/08/25…

🏛️ CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT Motor Vehicles Act, Sections 166 and 168 Dependency criterion for compensation – Both legally wedded wives of the deceased and their children, including illegitimate children, entitled to compensation if dependent on the deceased – Dependency is the basis for entitlement to compensation, not just legal heir status – Second wife treated

Rajmuni v/s State Civil Supplier MAC 1183/16 29/08/25… Read More »

Thammineni Bhaskar v/s The State of Andhra Pradesh: Criminal Appeal No. 4623 of 2024…

Supreme Court acquits man in murder-kidnapping case due to lack of evidence. The Supreme Court set aside the conviction as the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key eyewitnesses turned hostile, and there was no reliable evidence to establish kidnapping or last seen together. Court: Supreme Court of India Case: Criminal Appeal

Thammineni Bhaskar v/s The State of Andhra Pradesh: Criminal Appeal No. 4623 of 2024… Read More »

Legal Update:सुप्रीम कोर्ट का बड़ा फैसला Sec.420 IPC| फर्जी दस्तावेज़ से कोई लाभ न मिला तो धोखाधड़ी का अपराध नहीं: सुप्रीम कोर्ट…

सुप्रीम कोर्ट का बड़ा फैसला Sec.420 IPC| फर्जी दस्तावेज़ से कोई लाभ न मिला तो धोखाधड़ी का अपराध नहीं: सुप्रीम कोर्टसुप्रीम कोर्ट ने बुधवार (10 सितम्बर) को एक शैक्षणिक संस्थान के प्रमुख के खिलाफ दर्ज धोखाधड़ी का मामला रद्द कर दिया, जिन पर फर्जी फायर डिपार्टमेंट एनओसी का इस्तेमाल कर संबद्धता (affiliation) लेने का आरोप

Legal Update:सुप्रीम कोर्ट का बड़ा फैसला Sec.420 IPC| फर्जी दस्तावेज़ से कोई लाभ न मिला तो धोखाधड़ी का अपराध नहीं: सुप्रीम कोर्ट… Read More »

Legal Update: S.179(1) BNSS | पुलिस अधिकार के तौर पर मामले से परिचित ‘किसी भी व्यक्ति’ की उपस्थिति सुनिश्चित नहीं कर सकती: आंध्र प्रदेश हाईकोर्ट…

S.179(1) BNSS | पुलिस अधिकार के तौर पर मामले से परिचित ‘किसी भी व्यक्ति’ की उपस्थिति सुनिश्चित नहीं कर सकती: आंध्र प्रदेश हाईकोर्टCase Title: V D MOORTHY v. THE STATE OF AP and othersLegal Akhada updateआंध्र प्रदेश हाईकोर्ट ने कहा कि भारतीय नागरिक सुरक्षा संहिता (BNSS) की धारा 179(1) के तहत किसी पुलिस अधिकारी की

Legal Update: S.179(1) BNSS | पुलिस अधिकार के तौर पर मामले से परिचित ‘किसी भी व्यक्ति’ की उपस्थिति सुनिश्चित नहीं कर सकती: आंध्र प्रदेश हाईकोर्ट… Read More »

Premji Ratansey Shah and Ors. V/s Union of India (UOI) and Ors.: Whether trespasser can claim injunction against true owner of property?…

Whether trespasser can claim injunction against true owner of property?It is equally settled law that injunction would not be issued against the true owner. therefore, the Courts below have rightly rejected the relief of declaration and injunction in favour of the petitioners who have no interest in the property. Even assuming that they had any

Premji Ratansey Shah and Ors. V/s Union of India (UOI) and Ors.: Whether trespasser can claim injunction against true owner of property?… Read More »

Raj Kumar v/s Bhagat CR 7270/24 15/07/25…

🏛️ PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT HEADLINES ENGLISH AND HINDI Order 9, Rule 13 CPC Application to set aside ex parte judgment and decree – Dismissal of application – Petitioner failed to show valid reasons for non-appearance – Service of summons found valid – Process Server verified correct address and served notice at petitioner’s residence –

Raj Kumar v/s Bhagat CR 7270/24 15/07/25… Read More »

The State of Haryana v/s Jai Singh & Others…

Haryana loses land battle: unused ‘Bachat’ land stays with farmers, not state. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s ruling that unutilized bachat land reserved during consolidation does not vest in the State or Gram Panchayat. Such land must revert to the original landowners, as its reservation without specific common use violates constitutional protections under

The State of Haryana v/s Jai Singh & Others… Read More »

Kuldeep v/s State OF Uttarakhand CRLA FBA 1621/25 15/09/25…

Sections 420 and 120B IPC Bail application – Applicant accused of cheating and criminal conspiracy – Applicant in judicial custody – Co-accused granted bail – Charge-sheet already filed – Court held that there was no reason to keep the applicant behind bars for an indefinite period – Bail granted to the applicant on personal bond

Kuldeep v/s State OF Uttarakhand CRLA FBA 1621/25 15/09/25… Read More »