Uncategorized

2001(1) Kar. L.J. 210IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANYLIMITED, MYSOREVersusB.C. KUMAR AND ANOTHER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, Section 168- Accident – Injury Claim for compensation Driver of offending vehicle pleading guilty before Criminal Court – Whether it become sole criterion to allow claim – Conversion of a self-

Allahabad,HC Denies Relief To Man Accused Of Posting Lord Hanuman’s Disrespectable Picture On Social Media ◾Allahabad High Court recently refused to quash a criminal case against one Rajesh Kumar accused of posting a very objectionable and disrespectable picture of Lord Hanuman on social media with a very objectionable tagline. ◾Terming the allegations in the FIR

×××××× Legal Update ×××××× ✳️अग्रिम जमानत याचिका को इस आधार पर खारिज नहीं किया जा सकता कि चार्जशीट दायर की जा चुकी है या अदालत ने अपराध का संज्ञान लिया है: इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ====+====+====+====+==== 🟦इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ने हाल ही में कहा कि एक अभियुक्त द्वारा दायर अग्रिम जमानत आवेदन को इस आधार पर कभी भी

Allahabad,HC Denies Relief To Man Accused Of Posting Lord Hanuman’s Disrespectable Picture On Social Media ◾Allahabad High Court recently refused to quash a criminal case against one Rajesh Kumar accused of posting a very objectionable and disrespectable picture of Lord Hanuman on social media with a very objectionable tagline. ◾Terming the allegations in the FIR

धारा 397 IPC के अपराध के लिए सिर्फ उसी अभियुक्त को दण्डित किया जा सकता है जिसने अपराध में खतरनाक आयुध/शस्त्र का उपयोग किया हो। धारा 397 IPC किसी भी संयुक्त दायित्व (Constructive Liability) का गठन नहीं करती है। धारा 397 IPC के अपराध की पूर्णता के लिए सिर्फ इतना ही पर्याप्त है कि अभियुक्त

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (2022) AIR(SC) 5756 : (2023) AIR(SC)Civil 159 : (2022) 6 ALLMR 795 : (2023) 1 CivCC 281 : (2022) 11 JT 334 : (2022) 4 RLW 3018 : (2022) 16 SCALE 385 SUMER CORPORATION Vs.VIJAY ANANT GANGAN AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and M.M. Sundresh, JJ.

• Section 19, 190, 202, 204, 262, 265, 482 CRPC NI ACT Section 138, 141 Challenge Appeal against conviction High Court dismissed the petitions instituted by the appellants to quash the criminal complaint instituted by the second respondent for offences punishable and challenge an order of summons Mundra on the complaint The complaint arises from

• Punjab Courts Act, Section 36 Maligning Judicial Officers via Youtube After having heard learned counsel for the parties and going through the voluminous record on the file – On account of the variant stands of both the parties, it would be in the interest of justice, if proper charge is framed against the respondent-contemnor

AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 2191(From: 2000 APHC 2029) Civil Appeal No. 6345 of 2000,D.18-5-2007. M/s. Kamakshi Builders v. M/s. Ambedkar Educational Society & Ors. (A) Specific Relief Act (47 of 1963), S. 34-Suit for recovery of possession Termination of tenancy-Tenant running school on property, claimed to have acquired ownership in property by way of oral