admin_nupur

Civil Appeal No. 5205 of 2010)JULY 9, 2010 [2010] 8 S.C.R. 328 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. V.SANGHARAJ DAMODAR RUPAWATE & ORS. ◼️Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973- s. 95- Notification under – Forfeiture for of books – On the basis of FIR alleging offences u/ss. 153, 153A r/w s. 34 IPC-Notification quashed by High Court-On […]

हिन्दू दत्तक ग्रहण एवं भरण-पोषण अधिनियम, 1956—धारा 19(1) व 19(2)—विधवा पुत्रवधु द्वारा भरण-पोषण—विधवा पुत्रवधु अपने ससुर से भरण-पोषण केवल उन्हीं परिस्थितियों में प्राप्त कर सकती है जब ससुर के पास अविभाजित सँयुक्त परिवार की संपत्ति हो—इसके अतिरिक्त, विधवा पुत्रवधु के लिए यह स्थापित करना भी आवश्यक है कि अविभाजित पैतृक संपत्ति ससुर के कब्जे (Possession)

🔔 Daily News 🔔 📖

Validity of remarriage after ex parte decree of divorce. In case of an ex parte decree of divorce also it shall be lawful for either party to the marriage to marry again if no appeal is filed against such decree within the period of limitation of 90 days. It is trite that the dissolution of

SC weekly roundup in Pocso act Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015; Section 3 – A support person – whether involved from the early stages of lodging a report or brought on board shortly thereafter – can play a tremendous role in offering

Defamation. Advocate can not be sued for defamation for statements made during court proceedings No malice or motive can be imputed to such counsel for making any statement made on instructions of client. Court does not record statement in the presence of any friend circle or family members of the plaintiff and therefore, it cannot

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (2022) AIR(SC) 4286 : (2022) AIR(SC)Cri 1400 : (2022) ApexCriminalReports 935 : (2023) CriLR 351 : (2022) 3 CRIMES 454 : (2023) 1 ECrC 95 : (2022) 9 JT 167 : (2022) 4 RCR(Criminal) 733 : (2022) 13 SCALE 518 : (2022) 4 SCR 835 ,YASHPAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF

Law Point—The constant bickering in marital life, lack of mutual respect, detachment etc. would make the reconciliation impossible. Referred DecisionBeena M.S. v/s Shino G. Babu, [2022 (2) KHC 11]—”The law on divorce recognises both fault and consent as a cause for separation. When both the parties are unable to lead a meaningful matrimonial life due

Spouse suffering from epilepsy cannot be ground for divorce under Section 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, the Bombay High Court observed and upheld a family court order refusing divorce to a man.