admin_nupur

Tenant remains a tenant till sale deed is executed in his favour on the basis of agreement to sell. Until specific performance of the unregistered agreement to sell has been ordered by court of law, the tenant in the suit property shall continue to remain as a tenant. M/s Jagdambey Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. J.S.

The three-Judge Bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, and Justice K.V. Viswanathan emphasised, “The doctrine of stare decisis lays importance on stability and predictability in the legal system and mandates that a view consistently upheld by courts over a long period must be followed, unless it is manifestly

MOU if delivered possession of immovable must be registered . Otherwise it is not admissible in evidence . No benefit under section 53 A of TPAct can be claimed on the basis of unregistered deed. The agreement of sale is dated 29.11.2011 and MOU is dated 08.12.2021, which is obviously after coming into force of

CRL.M.C. 3061/2025 & CRL.M.A. 13572/2025Ankit Raj v. State of NCT of Delhi and Others A Single Bench of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma remarked, “The law governing offence of rape is intended to protect the bodily integrity and autonomy of women and to punish those who exploit them by force or by deception which vitiates free

🏛️ PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT HEADLINES ENGLISH AND HINDI Motor Vehicles Act, Rash and negligent driving – Determination of liability – Held, credible and consistent eyewitness testimony attributing negligence to the motorcyclist, which remained unrebutted, should be given substantial weight – FIR cannot automatically override such testimony – Tribunal’s finding holding scooter driver/owner liable reversed,

Supreme Court upholds Karta’s sale of HUF property for daughter’s marriage as legal necessity. The Supreme Court reversed the High Court’s decision, holding that the sale of joint family property by the Karta was for legal necessity (marriage expenses of the daughter) and the purchaser was bona fide. The High Court erred in ignoring evidence

Supreme Court upholds Father’s custody of son, slams mother’s “deceptive conduct” The Supreme Court ruled that the interim custody of the minor son, Master K, shall remain with the father, considering his suitability as a natural guardian and the mother’s failure to act in the child’s welfare by concealing his whereabouts and violating court orders.

🏛️ SUPREME COURT OF INDIA HEADLINES ENGLISH AND HINDI International Custody Disputes Comity of Courts – Welfare of the Child – Held, while respecting the doctrine of comity of courts, the best interests of the child take precedence – Directions issued by foreign courts are not binding if they are contrary to the welfare of

🏛️ CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT Motor Vehicles Act, Sections 166 and 168 Dependency criterion for compensation – Both legally wedded wives of the deceased and their children, including illegitimate children, entitled to compensation if dependent on the deceased – Dependency is the basis for entitlement to compensation, not just legal heir status – Second wife treated