हिन्दू दत्तक ग्रहण एवं भरण-पोषण अधिनियम, 1956—धारा 19(1) व 19(2)—विधवा पुत्रवधु द्वारा भरण-पोषण—विधवा पुत्रवधु अपने ससुर से भरण-पोषण केवल उन्हीं परिस्थितियों में प्राप्त कर सकती है जब ससुर के पास अविभाजित सँयुक्त परिवार की संपत्ति हो—इसके अतिरिक्त, विधवा पुत्रवधु के लिए यह स्थापित करना भी आवश्यक है कि अविभाजित पैतृक संपत्ति ससुर के कब्जे (Possession) […]
Kalyan v/s Mosmat…Civil Misc. Jurisdiction No. 354 /2018 Read More »
Validity of remarriage after ex parte decree of divorce. In case of an ex parte decree of divorce also it shall be lawful for either party to the marriage to marry again if no appeal is filed against such decree within the period of limitation of 90 days. It is trite that the dissolution of
SC weekly roundup in Pocso act Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015; Section 3 – A support person – whether involved from the early stages of lodging a report or brought on board shortly thereafter – can play a tremendous role in offering
SC weekly roundup in Pocso act… Read More »
Defamation. Advocate can not be sued for defamation for statements made during court proceedings No malice or motive can be imputed to such counsel for making any statement made on instructions of client. Court does not record statement in the presence of any friend circle or family members of the plaintiff and therefore, it cannot
Pankaj Oswal vs. Vikas Pahwa (09.02.2023 – DELHC) : MANU/DE/0789/2023… Read More »
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (2022) AIR(SC) 4286 : (2022) AIR(SC)Cri 1400 : (2022) ApexCriminalReports 935 : (2023) CriLR 351 : (2022) 3 CRIMES 454 : (2023) 1 ECrC 95 : (2022) 9 JT 167 : (2022) 4 RCR(Criminal) 733 : (2022) 13 SCALE 518 : (2022) 4 SCR 835 ,YASHPAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF
Law Point—The constant bickering in marital life, lack of mutual respect, detachment etc. would make the reconciliation impossible. Referred DecisionBeena M.S. v/s Shino G. Babu, [2022 (2) KHC 11]—”The law on divorce recognises both fault and consent as a cause for separation. When both the parties are unable to lead a meaningful matrimonial life due
Sreedharan v/s Ahsa… Mat. Appeal no. 578/2015 Read More »
Spouse suffering from epilepsy cannot be ground for divorce under Section 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, the Bombay High Court observed and upheld a family court order refusing divorce to a man.
