• Section 100 CPC Suit for Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Suit decreed in favour of plaintiff Appeal filed against same allowed dismissing the suit of plaintiff Hence present second appeal has been filed The suit being one for injunction to protect the plaintiff’s possession from a threatened or impending act of disturbance thereof by the defendants, […]
Ram vs Amar SA 313/1997 19/01/23 [ MUNIR JJ ] Read More »
2001(1) Kar. L.J. 210IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANYLIMITED, MYSOREVersusB.C. KUMAR AND ANOTHER MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, Section 168- Accident – Injury Claim for compensation Driver of offending vehicle pleading guilty before Criminal Court – Whether it become sole criterion to allow claim – Conversion of a self-
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANYLIMITED, MYSOREVersusB.C. KUMAR AND ANOTHER Read More »
Allahabad,HC Denies Relief To Man Accused Of Posting Lord Hanuman’s Disrespectable Picture On Social Media ◾Allahabad High Court recently refused to quash a criminal case against one Rajesh Kumar accused of posting a very objectionable and disrespectable picture of Lord Hanuman on social media with a very objectionable tagline. ◾Terming the allegations in the FIR
Rajesh Kumar vs. State of U.P. and Another [APPLICATION U/S 482 No. – 21056 Read More »
×××××× Legal Update ×××××× ✳️अग्रिम जमानत याचिका को इस आधार पर खारिज नहीं किया जा सकता कि चार्जशीट दायर की जा चुकी है या अदालत ने अपराध का संज्ञान लिया है: इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ====+====+====+====+==== 🟦इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट ने हाल ही में कहा कि एक अभियुक्त द्वारा दायर अग्रिम जमानत आवेदन को इस आधार पर कभी भी
केस टाइटल :- डॉ. कार्तिकेय शर्मा और 2 अन्य बनाम यूपी राज्यऔर अन्य Read More »
Allahabad,HC Denies Relief To Man Accused Of Posting Lord Hanuman’s Disrespectable Picture On Social Media ◾Allahabad High Court recently refused to quash a criminal case against one Rajesh Kumar accused of posting a very objectionable and disrespectable picture of Lord Hanuman on social media with a very objectionable tagline. ◾Terming the allegations in the FIR
Case title – Rajesh Kumar vs. State of U.P. and Another [APPLICATION U/S 482 No. – 21056 Read More »
धारा 397 IPC के अपराध के लिए सिर्फ उसी अभियुक्त को दण्डित किया जा सकता है जिसने अपराध में खतरनाक आयुध/शस्त्र का उपयोग किया हो। धारा 397 IPC किसी भी संयुक्त दायित्व (Constructive Liability) का गठन नहीं करती है। धारा 397 IPC के अपराध की पूर्णता के लिए सिर्फ इतना ही पर्याप्त है कि अभियुक्त
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (2022) AIR(SC) 5756 : (2023) AIR(SC)Civil 159 : (2022) 6 ALLMR 795 : (2023) 1 CivCC 281 : (2022) 11 JT 334 : (2022) 4 RLW 3018 : (2022) 16 SCALE 385 SUMER CORPORATION Vs.VIJAY ANANT GANGAN AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and M.M. Sundresh, JJ.
SUMER CORPORATION Vs.VIJAY ANANT GANGAN AND OTHERS — Respondent Read More »
• Section 19, 190, 202, 204, 262, 265, 482 CRPC NI ACT Section 138, 141 Challenge Appeal against conviction High Court dismissed the petitions instituted by the appellants to quash the criminal complaint instituted by the second respondent for offences punishable and challenge an order of summons Mundra on the complaint The complaint arises from
SUNIL vs STATE CRLA 1446/21 03/12/21 [ A.S. BOPANNA JJ ] [ SUPREME COURT ] Read More »
• Punjab Courts Act, Section 36 Maligning Judicial Officers via Youtube After having heard learned counsel for the parties and going through the voluminous record on the file – On account of the variant stands of both the parties, it would be in the interest of justice, if proper charge is framed against the respondent-contemnor
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION vs HARMEET CROCP 10/13 03/06/20 [ Jawant JJ ] Read More »
