Gopalasamy Jayaraman (died) Vs. Kothandaraman
[2023 (3) CTC 753)
Date of Judgment:
24.02.2023
š”Joint Possession” The phrase “joint possession” has to be interpreted viz-a-viz., exclusion from possession – “Joint Possession” Interpretation and requisites Suffice to show property is Joint Family property and right to Partition exists Not necessary to be in actual possession of whole or part of property or receive income/share from property Joint possession presumed, unless exclusion of possession is alleged and proved.
