Cri MC No. 2286 of 2006,
D.26-3-2018.
◼️(ORISSA HIGH COURT)
◼️Hadu Dandasena and others v. Mangal Dandasena.
◼️Cri MC No. 2286 of 2006,
D.26-3-2018.
◼️Criminal P. C. (2 of 1974), Ss. 190, 482 Penal Code (45 of 1860), S. 294 nizance of offence Cog Allegations of using obscene language is public.Accused persons allegedly insulted informant in front of his relatives using obscene language, when informant tried to prohibit accused from entering his backyard Informant making allegations specifically against one of accused None of remaining co accused abused informant Name of all tha accused to have abused informant, appear per to be error on record Despite minor dise of crepancies in statement of witness, all of them clearly stated that accused used abusive words against informant Cognizance of offence rightly taken against accused Proceedings against co accused, liable to be quashed.