TUSHAR vs State CRLMC 281/20 27/08/21 [ Manoj JJ ]

  • Sections 354, 354A and 354D IPC Discharge Complainant has alleged in her complaint that the petitioner used to come to her cabin on one or the other pretext and do galat harka (wrong deeds) with her and touch her inappropriately time and again. The complainant has also alleged that the petitioner wanted to cause sexual harassment to the complainant and on the pretext of enhancing her salary, coaxed her to accede to his demands When she refused, he would be peeved and she was further harassed Complainant has stated that due to fear of him, she had started taking food in her own room and minimized the interactions with him. She even tried to make the petitioner understand but he did not relent In her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., it was stated that the petitioner proposed her for physical relationship While noting the allegations, the Sessions Court came to the conclusion that the ingredients of all the alleged offences were made out and on prima facie view of the materials placed on record, no case of discharge was made out in favour of the petitioner

TUSHAR vs State CRLMC 281/20 27/08/21 [ Manoj JJ ]

[ DELHI HIGH COURT ]

0Shares

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *