Uncategorized
Shashikant Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. [Criminal Appeal No(s)._______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (Criminal) No(s). 5323 of 2023]
Shashikant Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. [Criminal Appeal No(s)._______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (Criminal) No(s). 5323 of 2023] Mehta, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The instant appeal has been preferred by the accused appellants questioning the legality and validity of the Order dated 6th April, 2023 passed by
P. C. Varghese v. Devaki Amma Balambika Devi and others.
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 145(From: (2000)3 Ker. L. T. 330) C. A. No. 1984 of 2002,D. 7-10-2005. P. C. Varghese v. Devaki Amma Balambika Devi and others. ðSpecific Relief Act (47 of 1963). Se. 12(3), 20- “Unable to perform the whole contract Agreement to sell prop- Everywhere stating that in event per mission to sell
P. C. Varghese v. Devaki Amma Balambika Devi and others. Read More »
Additional Tahsildar & Anr. Vs. Urmila G. & Ors.
Additional Tahsildar & Anr. Vs. Urmila G. & Ors. [Civil Appeal No(S).________ of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 2652 of 2023] [Civil Appeal No(S).________ of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 2652 of 2023] Rajesh Bindal, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Despite service, no one had appeared for the respondents. 3. The
Additional Tahsildar & Anr. Vs. Urmila G. & Ors. Read More »
Union of India v. Bright Projects (India) (P) Ltd. (2015) 9 SCC 695
ðSection 31(a) and 34– Pendent elite interest-effect of the words unlessotherwise agreed by parties‖ in Section 31(7) (a) of the Act ðBeing aggrieved by the judgment delivered in Union of India v. Bright Power Projects (I) (P) Ltd. dated 7-8-2006 by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay, this appeal has been filed wherein the
Union of India v. Bright Projects (India) (P) Ltd. (2015) 9 SCC 695 Read More »
BENNY DSOUZA vs. MELWIN DSOUZA. Diary No.- 42876-2023.. Order 41 Rule 17 CPC..
Order 41 Rule 17 CPC – Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed On Merits If Appellant Fails To Appear; To Be Dismissed For Non-Prosecution : Supreme Court. The Supreme Court stated that if the appellant does not appear when the appeal is called for a hearing, then the same can be dismissed for non-prosecution and not on
BENNY DSOUZA vs. MELWIN DSOUZA. Diary No.- 42876-2023.. Order 41 Rule 17 CPC.. Read More »
Delhi International Airport Ltd. Vs. Airports Economic Regulatory Authority & Ors…
Delhi International Airport Ltd. Vs. Airports Economic Regulatory Authority & Ors. [Miscellaneous Application No. 1721/2023 in C.A. No. 8378/2018] [Miscellaneous Application No. 1710/2023 in C.A. No. 5401/2019] Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. We thought that our judgment in Delhi International Airport Limited v. Airport Economic Regulatory Authority of India1 would have resolved all the issues.
Delhi International Airport Ltd. Vs. Airports Economic Regulatory Authority & Ors… Read More »
Legal Facts…. जानिए अदालत में चेक बाउंस केस लगाने की पूरी प्रक्रिया।
जानिए अदालत में चेक बाउंस केस लगाने की पूरी प्रक्रिया। चेक बाउंस का प्रकरण अत्यंत साधारण प्रकरण होता है। इस प्रकरण की किसी भी कोर्ट में अत्यधिक भरमार है। वर्तमान समय में अधिकांश भुगतान चेक के माध्यम से किए जा रहे हैं। किसी भी व्यापारिक एवं पारिवारिक क्रम में लोगों द्वारा एक दूसरों को चेक
Legal Facts…. जानिए अदालत में चेक बाउंस केस लगाने की पूरी प्रक्रिया। Read More »
पर्वीन्दर सिंह कित्तना बनाम पंजाब राज्य व अन्य. पंजाब और हरियाणा उच्च न्यायालय ने “मुख्यमंत्री तीर्थ यात्रा योजना” को चुनौती देने वाली जनहित याचिका पर राज्य से जवाब मांगा..
Legal update ð ¾️पंजाब और हरियाणा उच्च न्यायालय ने “मुख्यमंत्री तीर्थ यात्रा योजना” को चुनौती देने वाली जनहित याचिका पर राज्य से जवाब मांगा ð¥पंजाब एंड हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट ने हाल ही में शुरू की गई “मुख्यमंत्री तीर्थ यात्रा योजना” को चुनौती देने वाली जनहित याचिका (पीआईएल) पर पंजाब सरकार से जवाब मांगा। एक्टिंग चीफ़ जस्टिस रितु
