Uncategorized

Legal Facts: No Evidence Could Be Led Beyond Pleadings : Supreme Court

Supreme court/No Evidence Could Be Led Beyond…No Evidence Could Be Led Beyond Pleadings : Supreme Court5 Mar 2024 The Supreme Court observed that the evidence which was not a part of the pleadings couldn’t be led in the trial. “There is no quarrel with the proposition of law that no evidence could be led beyond […]

Legal Facts: No Evidence Could Be Led Beyond Pleadings : Supreme Court Read More »

Sec.439(2)Crpc,Bhuri Bai vs State of Madhya Pradesh2022 (SC) 956 | CrA 1972 of 2022 | 11 Nov 2022 |…

*Section 439(2) CrPC – *Bail Cannot Be Cancelled Merely For Any Perceived Indiscipline By Accused Before Granting Bail :*Supreme Court Case detailsBhuri Bai vs State of Madhya Pradesh2022 (SC) 956 | CrA 1972 of 2022 | 11 Nov 2022 | BenchJustices Dinesh Maheshwari and Sudhanshu dhulia The Supreme Court observed that cancellation of bail cannot

Sec.439(2)Crpc,Bhuri Bai vs State of Madhya Pradesh2022 (SC) 956 | CrA 1972 of 2022 | 11 Nov 2022 |… Read More »

M/s. Arif Azim Co. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Aptech Ltd.[Arbitration Petition No. 29 of 2023]…

M/s. Arif Azim Co. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Aptech Ltd.[Arbitration Petition No. 29 of 2023]J. B. Pardiwala, J.:For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:-INDEXA.FACTUAL MATRIX ………2B.SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER ……..15C.SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT ……18D.ANALYSIS ……..21i.ISSUE NO. 1: Whether the Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable to an application

M/s. Arif Azim Co. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Aptech Ltd.[Arbitration Petition No. 29 of 2023]… Read More »

Prevention of Corruption Act Section 20 (1) Order of acquittal.. STATE OF KERALA vs KUNHAPPAN CRLA 1726/10 17/08/23 [ KAUSER JJ ] [ KERALA HIGH COURT]…

• Prevention of Corruption Act Section 20 (1) Order of acquittal Challenged Held that the only condition for drawing the presumption is that during the trial it should be proved that the accused has accepted or agreed to accept any gratification and that once it is proved that gratification has been’ accepted, the presumption automatically

Prevention of Corruption Act Section 20 (1) Order of acquittal.. STATE OF KERALA vs KUNHAPPAN CRLA 1726/10 17/08/23 [ KAUSER JJ ] [ KERALA HIGH COURT]… Read More »

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173 Appeal…. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD vs SUKHPAL MACAPP 492/16 29/02/24 [ DHARMESH JJ ] [ DELHI HIGH COURT ]

• Motor Vehicles Act Section 173 Appeal filed by an insurance company against a compensation award granted to the wife of a deceased person who died in a road accident involving a car and a truck Modification of compensation – The court upheld the finding of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal that the driver of

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173 Appeal…. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD vs SUKHPAL MACAPP 492/16 29/02/24 [ DHARMESH JJ ] [ DELHI HIGH COURT ] Read More »

Rajasthan Control Act, Chain vs Sushila CWP 7177/23 18/01/24 [ NUPUR JJ ] [ RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT ]…

• Rajasthan Rent Control Act, Section 9(i) Order of eviction Bonafide need Writ petition by tenant Petitioner not denied fact that respondent/landlord is widow lady having three children, out of which, one girl child is unmarried and is pursuing her studies – Further, respondent specifically made out case by way of filing eviction petition that

Rajasthan Control Act, Chain vs Sushila CWP 7177/23 18/01/24 [ NUPUR JJ ] [ RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT ]… Read More »