Uncategorized

Whether trespasser can claim injunction against true owner of property?It is equally settled law that injunction would not be issued against the true owner. therefore, the Courts below have rightly rejected the relief of declaration and injunction in favour of the petitioners who have no interest in the property. Even assuming that they had any […]

🏛️ PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT HEADLINES ENGLISH AND HINDI Order 9, Rule 13 CPC Application to set aside ex parte judgment and decree – Dismissal of application – Petitioner failed to show valid reasons for non-appearance – Service of summons found valid – Process Server verified correct address and served notice at petitioner’s residence –

Haryana loses land battle: unused ‘Bachat’ land stays with farmers, not state. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s ruling that unutilized bachat land reserved during consolidation does not vest in the State or Gram Panchayat. Such land must revert to the original landowners, as its reservation without specific common use violates constitutional protections under

Sections 420 and 120B IPC Bail application – Applicant accused of cheating and criminal conspiracy – Applicant in judicial custody – Co-accused granted bail – Charge-sheet already filed – Court held that there was no reason to keep the applicant behind bars for an indefinite period – Bail granted to the applicant on personal bond

Important Provisions of Interest Act, 1978Statement of Objects and Reasons.—The Law Commission of India in its sixty-third report had recommended the revision of the existing Interest Act, 1839. This Act is a very short one; besides a preamble, it contains only one section and a proviso. However, it is a statute of importance, since it

अब सिर्फ़ एक ज़मानती देकर ही आरोपी/दोषी को ज़मानत पर छोड़ा जा सकता है। पूर्व की भाँति दो ज़मानती देना अनिवार्य नहीं है। मजिस्ट्रेट/अदालत को यह एक ज़मानती स्वीकार करनी होगी और यह निर्णय आरोपी की आर्थिक और सामाजिक स्थिति को देखकर लिया जाएगा। ज़मानत की रकम भी आरोपी की वित्तीय क्षमता के अनुसार तय

What is Difference between authority of reported and unreported judgment in india?The difference between reported and unreported judgments in India primarily relates to their publication, accessibility, precedent value, and impact within the legal system: Reported Judgments: These judgments are published in official law reports or legal journals. They usually involve important legal principles, new interpretations

Supreme Court clips Waqf Act’s wings, stays key land clause. The Supreme Court refused to grant an interim stay on the entire Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, but found a specific provision (the proviso to Section 3C(2)) to be “prima facie arbitrary” and “not sustainable in law” as it treats a property as non-waqf before an

The Supreme Court of India has delivered many landmark judgments that shaped Indian law, Constitution, democracy, and society. Here’s a list of famous Supreme Court judgments with short notes: 📌 Constitutional & Fundamental Rights Introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine – Parliament cannot alter the “basic structure” of the Constitution. Expanded Article 21 (Right to Life

बलात्संग—दोष-सिद्धि के विरुद्ध अपील—दोषसिद्धि का आदेश मुख्य रूप से “अंतिम बार साथ देखे जाने” की परिस्थिति पर आधारित—पीड़िता को गवाह के रूप में न्यायालय में प्रस्तुत नहीं किया गया—अभियोजन पीड़िता अथवा ऐसा कोई भी गवाह, जिसने उसे अभियुक्त के साथ देखा हो, को न्यायालय में पेश करने में विफल रहा—किसी प्रकार का फॉरेन्सिक साक्ष्य भी