admin_nupur

गिरफ्तारी एवं रिमांड— संवैधानिक सुरक्षा के अधिकार—अनुच्छेद 22(1) एवं दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता की धारा 50—अनिवार्य प्रावधानों का उल्लंघन—गिरफ्तारी के कारणों को लिखित रूप में न बताना—रिमांड कार्यवाही में प्रक्रियागत चूक—विधिक सहायता का अधिकार—मजिस्ट्रेट द्वारा न्यायिक परीक्षण—गिरफ्तारी के समय गिरफ्तारी के कारणों को लिखित रूप में न बताना संविधान के अनुच्छेद 22(1) तथा दण्ड प्रक्रिया संहिता […]

चैक अनादरण—उपधारणा—खंडन—धारा 118(क) एवं 139, एन०आई० एक्ट के अंतर्गत उत्पन्न विधिक उपधारणाएं खंडनीय होती हैं—अभियुक्त प्रारंभिक दायित्व का निर्वहन इस प्रकार कर सकता है जब वह संभावनाओं की प्रबलता (preponderance of probabilities) के आधार पर यह दर्शा दे कि उसके ऊपर परिवादी द्वारा दिया गया ऋण या देयता बकाया नहीं है—यदि न्यायालय इस निष्कर्ष पर

Muslim Law In respect of undivided property. Permissibility. Merely because a gift of an undivided property has been made. It cannot be said to be void. [Noor Ahmad v. Mohd. Ahmad, 2023 (161) ALR 833 (L.B.)]

Basic concepts: What is the difference between penalty and fine?Under Indian law, fines and penalties are distinct legal concepts with several key differences in their application, authority, and legal procedures. Authority and ImpositionFine is imposed exclusively by courts of law after completion of trial proceedings. A fine represents a monetary punishment ordered by a judge

Basic concepts: What are victimless crimes?A victimless crime is defined as a crime that has no direct victim, causes no direct harm to a third party, and involves one or more consenting adults. In the Indian legal context, these are activities that violate the law but do not have an identifiable victim, though they may

What is Expert Evidence as per S 39 of BSA?Expert evidence refers to testimony provided by a person who possesses specialized knowledge, skills, or experience in a particular field relevant to a legal case. This expertise enables them to provide opinions that are beyond the understanding of the average person and assists the court in

किसी व्यक्ति को पर्याप्त मुआवजा दिए बिना उसकी अपनी संपत्ति से वंचित नहीं किया जा सकता: सुप्रीम कोर्ट सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने कहा कि किसी व्यक्ति को कानून के अनुसार पर्याप्त मुआवजा दिए बिना उसकी संपत्ति से वंचित नहीं किया जा सकता। न्यायालय ने कर्नाटक उच्च न्यायालय की खंडपीठ के उस निर्णय के विरुद्ध प्रस्तुत सिविल

Landmark Judgements.. 📌 1. Mohammed Ahmed v. Shah Bano, 1985 📌 2. Shayara Bano v. Union of India, 2017 📌 3. Danial Latifi and another v. Union of India, 2001 📌 4. Shamim Ara v. State of U.P, 2002 📌 5. Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India, 1995SC observed that the practice of polygamy could

Muslim LawKhula explained. Khula is a form of divorce demanded by Muslim wife. Reasoning The Bench explained that the ‘Khula’ literally translates to relinquishment in Arabic. It is a mode of dissolution of marriage when the wife does not want to continue with the marital tie and can settle the matter privately by consulting a

📢 40 Most Important Landmark Judgement. 1. Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerela, 1973 SCDeclared Preamble as part of Constitution and introduced Basic Structure Doctrine. 2. E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu, 1974 SCIntroduced Doctrine of Non-arbitrariness redefining equality under Article 14. 3. Selvi v. State of Karnataka, 2010 SCLie detector test needs consent,