admin_nupur

🏛️ PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT ALKA SARIN J Motor Vehicle Act, Compensation – Enhancement of compensation awarded by Tribunal – Tribunal failed to consider future prospects for the deceased aged 31 years at the time of the accident – 40% addition towards future prospects allowed – Compensation under conventional heads like loss of estate, funeral […]

स्त्रीधन सूची—अदालत में प्रस्तुत न किए जाने पर दोष-मुक्ति का आदेश बरकरार—विवाह के समय दिए गए कथित उपहार मात्र पत्नी तथा उसके पिता के अप्रमाणित कथनों पर आधारित पाए गए—नियम 2 के अंतर्गत आवश्यक उपहार सूची पत्नी द्वारा प्रस्तुत नहीं की गई—प्रमाण के अभाव में गबन/दुर्विनियोग (Misappropriation) का आरोप सिद्ध नहीं हो सका—न्यायालय द्वारा पारित

Court Fee. When land revenue is paid on property, Court fee to be paid at 30 times of land revenue fixed on land If the suit is filed for the cancellation of instrument. Rajendra Prasad Yadav V. Ravindra Naath – 2014 (122) RD 507

‘Unutilised Village Lands Vest with Proprietors’: Supreme Court overturns 2022 ruling in Haryana village land dispute In civil appeals against Gurjant Singh, the State itself did not press the appeals with regard to the directions for redistribution of the bachat land amongst the proprietors according to their share. The only grievance of the State was

Name of the Case:- SAMYAK JAIN AND ORS v. KESRILAL MEHTA AND ORS. ,2025 (CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5289 OF 2025) Name of the Court:- Hon’ble Supreme Court Court Held:- Unmarried Daughter, Even if Employed, Is a Dependant for Accident Compensation. The Supreme Court of India, in a significant judgment concerning motor accident claims, has ruled

CHARGES SHOULD BE SPECIFIC AGAINST FAMILY MEMBERS FOR PROSECUTION, OTHERWISE IT MAY AMOUNT TO MISUSE OF CRIMINAL PROCESS In Geddam Jhansi v. State of Telangana, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 263, the Division Bench of BV Nagarathna and N. Kotiswar Singh*, JJ in SC quashes DV and Dowry case against two and inter-alia held that: –

Supreme Court reinstates lecturer, rules age-limit rules wrongly applied in 18-year-old appointment dispute. The Supreme Court set aside the Gauhati High Court’s order and reinstated the appellant, holding that the 2003 Rules (which imposed an age limit) did not apply to the selection process conducted under the 2001 Rules for an aided college post. The

Supreme Court halts vengeance FIR, slams criminalization of civil disputes. The Supreme Court quashed the criminal proceedings, ruling that the FIR was a malicious counterblast to a civil dispute and amounted to an abuse of the legal process. The allegations, even if true, disclosed no criminal offence and fell within the categories laid down in

Supreme Court backs government, upholds land takeback after 50-year legal battle. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, ruling that the colonial-era land grants were validly rescinded for non-cultivation. The Court found no legal basis for the landowners’ claims of waiver, acquiescence, or mala fides in the government’s action. Court:Supreme Court of India Case:Civil Appeal No.

Supreme Court axes DDA Land auction, orders Bank to refund crores to innocent bidder. The Supreme Court set aside the e-auction because it was conducted illegally. The Bank failed to disclose the DDA’s statutory claims, violating mandatory rules, and the auction purchaser was an innocent party who acted in good faith. Court:Supreme Court of India