Legal update 🅾️घरेलू हिंसा अधिनियम की धारा 31 के तहत भरण-पोषण आदेश का पालन न करने पर व्यक्ति को समन नहीं किया जा सकता: दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट 🟥दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट ने एक फैसले में कहा है कि कि भरण-पोषण के भुगतान के आदेश का पालन न करने पर किसी व्यक्ति को घरेलू हिंसा से महिलाओं की सुरक्षा […]
धारा 53 में उल्लिखित अधिकारी के लिए जब्त की गई वस्तु के विवरण, गुणवत्ता, मात्रा, पैकिंग के तरीके, नंबरिंग और पहचान चिह्नों जैसे पदार्थ की एक सूची तैयार करना अनिवार्य है—जाँच अधिकारी हिरासत में पदार्थों से लिए गए नमूनों की सूची की शुद्धता को प्रमाणित करने के लिए किसी भी मजिस्ट्रेट के पास आवेदन कर
Yusuf @ Asif v/s State. Crl. Appeal No. 3191 of 2023… Read More »
Shashikant Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. [Criminal Appeal No(s)._______ of 2023 arising out of SLP (Criminal) No(s). 5323 of 2023] Mehta, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The instant appeal has been preferred by the accused appellants questioning the legality and validity of the Order dated 6th April, 2023 passed by
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 145(From: (2000)3 Ker. L. T. 330) C. A. No. 1984 of 2002,D. 7-10-2005. P. C. Varghese v. Devaki Amma Balambika Devi and others. 📌Specific Relief Act (47 of 1963). Se. 12(3), 20- “Unable to perform the whole contract Agreement to sell prop- Everywhere stating that in event per mission to sell
P. C. Varghese v. Devaki Amma Balambika Devi and others. Read More »
Additional Tahsildar & Anr. Vs. Urmila G. & Ors. [Civil Appeal No(S).________ of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 2652 of 2023] [Civil Appeal No(S).________ of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) No. 2652 of 2023] Rajesh Bindal, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Despite service, no one had appeared for the respondents. 3. The
Additional Tahsildar & Anr. Vs. Urmila G. & Ors. Read More »
📌Section 31(a) and 34– Pendent elite interest-effect of the words unlessotherwise agreed by parties‖ in Section 31(7) (a) of the Act 📌Being aggrieved by the judgment delivered in Union of India v. Bright Power Projects (I) (P) Ltd. dated 7-8-2006 by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay, this appeal has been filed wherein the
Union of India v. Bright Projects (India) (P) Ltd. (2015) 9 SCC 695 Read More »
Order 41 Rule 17 CPC – Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed On Merits If Appellant Fails To Appear; To Be Dismissed For Non-Prosecution : Supreme Court. The Supreme Court stated that if the appellant does not appear when the appeal is called for a hearing, then the same can be dismissed for non-prosecution and not on
BENNY DSOUZA vs. MELWIN DSOUZA. Diary No.- 42876-2023.. Order 41 Rule 17 CPC.. Read More »
