admin_nupur

📢 40 Most Important Landmark Judgement. 1. Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerela, 1973 SCDeclared Preamble as part of Constitution and introduced Basic Structure Doctrine. 2. E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu, 1974 SCIntroduced Doctrine of Non-arbitrariness redefining equality under Article 14. 3. Selvi v. State of Karnataka, 2010 SCLie detector test needs consent, […]

📘 चार्जशीट दाखिल होने के बाद आरोपित अभियुक्त के पास कौन-कौन से कानूनी विकल्प उपलब्ध हैं? ⸻ जब किसी आपराधिक मामले में पुलिस जांच पूरी करके न्यायालय में (आरोप पत्र ) चार्जशीट दाखिल कर देती है, तो आरोपित अभियुक्त 👉 या तो वह उस जांच को चुनौती दे,👉 या अदालत में खुद को आरोपमुक्त करने

📑 10 Landmark Cases on Muslim Law 📌 1. Mohammed Ahmed v. Shah Bano, 1985 📌 2. Shayara Bano v. Union of India, 2017 📌 3. Danial Latifi and another v. Union of India, 2001 📌 4. Shamim Ara v. State of U.P, 2002 📌 5. Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India, 1995SC observed that

Whether person suffering from mental disease is exempted from criminal liability?Next question which needs consideration is as to on whom the onus lies to prove unsoundness of mind. In law, the presumption is that every person is sane to the extent that he knows the natural consequences of his act. The burden of proof in

📘 “Further Investigation (अग्रिम विवेचना) क्या है और यह कब संभव है? 🔍 परिचय: बहुत से पाठकों के द्वारा प्रश्न पूछा गया है कि जब पुलिस एक आपराधिक मामले की जाँच पूरी कर लेती है और चार्जशीट (Charge Sheet) या अंतिम रिपोर्ट (Final Report) न्यायालय में दाखिल कर देती है, अगर पुलिस के द्वारा सही

 Chief Justice Nagu Flags Dangerous Trend Of Filing Vakalatnamas To Shift Cases From Particular Benches Saurabh MalikTribune News ServiceChandigarh, Updated At : 02:26 PM Jul 03, 2025 IST Expressing serious concern over alleged tactics to secure favourable Benches, Punjab and Haryana High Court Chief Justice Sheel Nagu on Thursday termed the emerging “trend” of advocates filing powers

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Central Bureau of Investigation vs Shyam Bihari & Others Case No :- CRLAPPEAL 413/13 DATE OF DECISION:- 17-07-2023 HEADNOTE WITH FULL TEXT JUDGMENT CRIMINAL LAWS Murder by policemen – Reliability of ocular evidence of PW3 and PW6 – As per the FIR filed by PW6, while he and PW3, on

Guidelines of Supreme Court for expeditious disposal of cheque dishonour cases 1) The High Courts are requested to issue practice directions to the Magistrates to record reasons before converting trial of complaints Under Section 138 of the Act from summary trial to summons trial. 2) Inquiry shall be conducted on receipt of complaints Under Section

Replication – Replication though not pleading specifically provided but it attains character of pleadings when permitted to be filed by Court. (2025(1) Civil Court Cases 484 (P&H) Review – Failure of Court to decide a plea that has not been raised, cannot be termed as an error apparent on the face of record. (2023(3) Civil

🛑 Landmark Judgment 🗣️ Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, 2020 SC