admin_nupur

⚡️वक़्फ़ क्या है?वक्फ़ इस्लामिक नियमों के अनुसार वह संपत्ति है जो केवल और केवल मज़हबी और दान के कार्यों में प्रयुक्त हो सकती है। नया क़ानून पुराने से भिन्न कैसे है?1- पुराने क़ानून में वक़्फ़ बोर्ड किसी भी प्रॉपर्टी पर दावा कर सकती थी, जिसके निस्तारण के लिए वक्फ़ ट्रिब्यूनल में ही जाना होता था। […]

NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION & ORS. V. UNION OF INDIA & ANR [ W.P.(C) 10683/2022] along with W.P.(C) 10867/2022BENCH: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M SINGH COURT: DELHI HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT DATE: MARCH 28, 2025 In a key judgment, the Delhi High Court ruled that service charge or tip is a voluntary payment by the customer and cannot be

Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana at ChandigarhCase: CRA-48-DBA-2004 (State of Punjab vs. Dharminder Singh etc.)Date of Judgment: 24.03.2025Act: Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act) The appeal against the acquittal of respondents for poppy husk possession was dismissed due to non-compliance with Section 41(2) of the NDPS Act, as the secret information

The Supreme Court today (March 18) emphasized the need for the direct transfer of motor accident claim compensation to claimants’ bank accounts to minimize delays and ensure timely payments. “The general practice followed by the insurance companies, where the compensation is not disputed, is to deposit the same before the Tribunal. Instead of following that

The Supreme Court held that when a property transfer involves considerations such as love and affection while the donor retains a life interest, it qualifies as a settlement deed in the form of a gift. The Court further clarified that once the donee accepts the gift through the settlement deed, the donor cannot unilaterally revoke

Supreme Court Grants permission to Adv Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal to make representation to Ministry of Law to change the law to grant Advertisment permission and Alternate Parallel vocation permission for lawyers and records that BCI will not oppose it – PIL filed by Adv Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal President Nitya Law Society- Wp 627 Of 2020

The Supreme Court has explained that the cause of action for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) arises not on the dishonour of the cheque but when the amount remains unpaid after the expiry of fifteen days following the receipt of the demand notice. The bench comprising Justice

Smt. N. Usha Rani V. Moodudula Srinivas (2025 SC)

धारा 319, दं०प्र०सं० का उद्देश्य न्याय के प्रशासन को प्रभावी रूप से सुनिश्चित करना है, जिससे अदालतों को उन व्यक्तियों के खिलाफ कार्यवाही करने का अधिकार मिलता है, जो व्यक्ति चार्जशीट में अभियुक्त के रूप में नामित नहीं किए गए होते हैं, फिर भी जिनके अपराध करने की संभावना है। यह प्रावधान ऐसे मामलों को