admin_nupur

• Murder The appellant was convicted for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 302 of the IPC and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to a pay a fine of Rs.5000/and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for two years The recovery of the green colour wire […]

तलाक-ए-हसन और तलाक-ए-अहसन वैध: केरल हाईकोर्ट ने तलाक तात्कालिक नहीं होने के कारण मुस्लिम पति के खिलाफ आपराधिक कार्यवाही रद्द की 🔘 केरल हाईकोर्ट ने तीन तलाक पर कानून की व्याख्या करते हुए हाल ही में मुस्लिम पति के खिलाफ आपराधिक कार्यवाही यह पाते हुए रद्द कर दी कि उसने तलाक-ए-हसन कहा था, जो मुस्लिम

K.Kumaresan & Ors. Vs. State, rep, by the Inspector of Police, T-15, SRMC Police Station, Porur. [2023 (1) L.W. (Crl.) 904) [2023 (1) L.W. (Crl.) 904) Date of Judgment:18.05.2023 📌Narcotic Drugs Seizure Mandatory Provisions to be compiled Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8(c) r/w. 22, 28, 29, 42. 50 Pw1-Sub Inspector had

The criminal trials in India can be be broadly categorized into three stages namely; A. Pre-trial stage B. Trial stage C. Post-trial stage. A. Pre-trial Stage A. Pre-trial stage B. Trial stage C. Post-trial stage Now, each stage requires some detailed steps to be fulfilled A. Pre-trial Stage Information of cognizable offence.Information of non cognizable

Vishnu Kumar Shukla & Anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. A1: Vishnu Kumar ShuklaA2: Vineeta Shukla R1: The State of Uttar PradeshR2: Ram Kumar Garg [Criminal Appeal No. 3618 of 2023 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 8658 of 2017] Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the Final Judgment

🔔 Daily News 🔔 📖

SC criminal digest of September Bail – One cannot apply one bail order to all the other subsequent cases. (Para 8) PACL v. Central Bureau of Investigation, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 747 : 2023 INSC 795 Can anticipatory bail be granted to proclaimed offender? only in exceptional & rare cases, holds the Supreme Court. State of

Gopalasamy Jayaraman (died) Vs. Kothandaraman[2023 (3) CTC 753) Date of Judgment:24.02.2023 📌”Joint Possession” The phrase “joint possession” has to be interpreted viz-a-viz., exclusion from possession – “Joint Possession” Interpretation and requisites Suffice to show property is Joint Family property and right to Partition exists Not necessary to be in actual possession of whole or part

AIR 2006 SC 2568(From: Madras)* Criminal Appeal No. 582 of 2000, D.4- 7-2006. State of Tamil Nadu v. Ravi @ Nehru. 📌Penal Code (45 of 1860), S. 376 Rape Medical evidence – Reliability statement of prosecutrix girl of 5 years well corroborated by witness who was at place of incidence – Though doctor who exam-