admin_nupur

Legal News…तलाक-ए-हसन और तलाक-ए-अहसन वैध: केरल हाईकोर्ट ने तलाक तात्कालिक नहीं होने के कारण मुस्लिम पति के खिलाफ आपराधिक कार्यवाही रद्द की…

तलाक-ए-हसन और तलाक-ए-अहसन वैध: केरल हाईकोर्ट ने तलाक तात्कालिक नहीं होने के कारण मुस्लिम पति के खिलाफ आपराधिक कार्यवाही रद्द की 🔘 केरल हाईकोर्ट ने तीन तलाक पर कानून की व्याख्या करते हुए हाल ही में मुस्लिम पति के खिलाफ आपराधिक कार्यवाही यह पाते हुए रद्द कर दी कि उसने तलाक-ए-हसन कहा था, जो मुस्लिम […]

Legal News…तलाक-ए-हसन और तलाक-ए-अहसन वैध: केरल हाईकोर्ट ने तलाक तात्कालिक नहीं होने के कारण मुस्लिम पति के खिलाफ आपराधिक कार्यवाही रद्द की… Read More »

K.Kumaresan & Ors. Vs. State, rep, by the Inspector of Police, T-15, SRMC Police Station, Porur

K.Kumaresan & Ors. Vs. State, rep, by the Inspector of Police, T-15, SRMC Police Station, Porur. [2023 (1) L.W. (Crl.) 904) [2023 (1) L.W. (Crl.) 904) Date of Judgment:18.05.2023 📌Narcotic Drugs Seizure Mandatory Provisions to be compiled Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8(c) r/w. 22, 28, 29, 42. 50 Pw1-Sub Inspector had

K.Kumaresan & Ors. Vs. State, rep, by the Inspector of Police, T-15, SRMC Police Station, Porur Read More »

Legal Facts…Criminal trials in India…

The criminal trials in India can be be broadly categorized into three stages namely; A. Pre-trial stage B. Trial stage C. Post-trial stage. A. Pre-trial Stage A. Pre-trial stage B. Trial stage C. Post-trial stage Now, each stage requires some detailed steps to be fulfilled A. Pre-trial Stage Information of cognizable offence.Information of non cognizable

Legal Facts…Criminal trials in India… Read More »

Vishnu Kumar Shukla & Anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. [Criminal Appeal No. 3618 of 2023 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 8658 of 2017]

Vishnu Kumar Shukla & Anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. A1: Vishnu Kumar ShuklaA2: Vineeta Shukla R1: The State of Uttar PradeshR2: Ram Kumar Garg [Criminal Appeal No. 3618 of 2023 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 8658 of 2017] Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the Final Judgment

Vishnu Kumar Shukla & Anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. [Criminal Appeal No. 3618 of 2023 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 8658 of 2017] Read More »

Gopalasamy Jayaraman (died) Vs. Kothandaraman[2023 (3) CTC 753). Joint Possession.

Gopalasamy Jayaraman (died) Vs. Kothandaraman[2023 (3) CTC 753) Date of Judgment:24.02.2023 📌”Joint Possession” The phrase “joint possession” has to be interpreted viz-a-viz., exclusion from possession – “Joint Possession” Interpretation and requisites Suffice to show property is Joint Family property and right to Partition exists Not necessary to be in actual possession of whole or part

Gopalasamy Jayaraman (died) Vs. Kothandaraman[2023 (3) CTC 753). Joint Possession. Read More »

Criminal Appeal No. 582 of 2000, D.4- 7-2006. State of Tamil Nadu v. Ravi @ Nehru.

AIR 2006 SC 2568(From: Madras)* Criminal Appeal No. 582 of 2000, D.4- 7-2006. State of Tamil Nadu v. Ravi @ Nehru. 📌Penal Code (45 of 1860), S. 376 Rape Medical evidence – Reliability statement of prosecutrix girl of 5 years well corroborated by witness who was at place of incidence – Though doctor who exam-

Criminal Appeal No. 582 of 2000, D.4- 7-2006. State of Tamil Nadu v. Ravi @ Nehru. Read More »

Chetram vs. karishma. 21 November 2023. Mat Appeal(F.C.)No. 196/2023

Law Point 2—Refusal to engage in gainful employment without adequate justification or earnest job-seeking efforts in the presence of reasonable earning capacity should not burden the other party with unilateral financial responsibilities. पत्नी द्वारा जीविका कमाने में सक्षम होने के बावजूद भी आय के साधन ना तलाशना, दूसरे पक्ष (पति) पर एकतरफा बोझ डालने के

Chetram vs. karishma. 21 November 2023. Mat Appeal(F.C.)No. 196/2023 Read More »