admin_nupur

20,000/- रु० से अधिक की नकद ऋण राशि, जो आयकर अधिनियम की धारा 269SS का उल्लंघन करते हुए दी गई हो, उसकी वापसी हेतु जारी किया गया चेक परक्राम्य लिखत अधिनियम की धारा 138 के अंतर्गत “विधिक रूप से देय ऋण या दायित्व” की श्रेणी में नहीं आता—जब उक्त लेन-देन के संबंध में शिकायतकर्ता द्वारा […]

Supreme Court: Magistrate’s Order U/S. 156(3) CrPC For registration of FIR is Not Vitiated Merely Because Complainant Didn’t Avail Remedy Under S.154(3)In the facts and circumstances of the case, as the informant had directly moved the Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the CrPC without exhausting his statutory remedies, the Magistrate could have avoided taking action

Supreme Court: The Court should not refuse a bail to accused if multiple crimes are pending against himThe offence alleged no doubt is grave and serious and there are several criminal cases pending against the Accused. These factors by themselves cannot be the basis for refusal of prayer for bail. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF

Injunction. If the plaintiff has sold part of disputed property, he is bound to give the details of the sale deed otherwise he shall be guilty of concealment of facts and shall not be entitled to injunction. 2019(142) RD 348Ramesh vs U.P State

Restoration 2025 (170) ALR 768Inder Singh vs State of U.P

Landmark Judgment by Delhi High Court Reinforces Women’s On 22nd July 2025, the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi delivered a groundbreaking final decree in CS(OS) 78/2023, a civil suit filed by Mrs. Sunita Kumari Ganotra. The verdict underscores key aspects of property law, notably gender justice under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, and sets

Understanding the Alteration and Revocation of Wills Under Indian LawA will is a crucial legal document that allows an individual (the testator) to express their wishes regarding the distribution of their property after death. However, circumstances and intentions can change during a person’s lifetime, raising important questions about how and when a will can be

👆📌Supreme Court questions restriction of No-Fault claims to third parties, seeks larger bench clarity The Supreme Court doubted prior rulings limiting Section 163A claims to third parties, emphasizing its overriding “no-fault liability” provision. It restored compensation for the minor petitioner’s mother’s death but referred the issue of insurer liability for the owner-driver’s death to a

“Supreme Court upholds Pollution Boards’ power to levy environmental damages” The Supreme Court ruled that Pollution Control Boards can impose and collect restitutionary or compensatory damages, including fixed sums or bank guarantees, under Sections 33A and 31A of the Water and Air Acts, reversing the Delhi High Court’s restrictive interpretation. Court:Supreme Court of India Case:Delhi

“Supreme Court backs wind energy firms in tariff dispute againstGUVNL” The Supreme Court dismissed GUVNL’s appeals, ruling that wind energy companies not availing accelerated depreciation under income tax laws were entitled to seek separate tariff determination by GERC, as per the 2010 Tariff Order. Court:Supreme Court of India Case:Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) vs.