Uncategorized

VIPIN JAISWAL (A-I) Vs STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED

(2013) 3 Supreme Court Cases 684 VIPIN JAISWAL (A-I) Vs STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED A. Penal Code, 1860 – Ss. 304-B and 498-A – Dowry death alleged – Suicide by wife – Husband accused of abetting the same and causing dowry death – Suicide note allegedly written by deceased found – Said note holding […]

VIPIN JAISWAL (A-I) Vs STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED Read More »

केस टाइटल: मोहम्मद रहीम अशोरी और अन्य बनाम हरियाणा राज्य

Legal update 🅾️पंजाब एंड हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट ने वीजा अवधि समाप्त होने के बाद भी भारत में रहने के आरोपी अफगान नागरिकों को जमानत दी 🟥पंजाब एंड हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट ने यह देखते हुए कि मुकदमा धीमी गति से चल रहा है तीन अफगान निवासियों को जमानत दे दी, जो अपने वीजा और पासपोर्ट की अवधि समाप्त

केस टाइटल: मोहम्मद रहीम अशोरी और अन्य बनाम हरियाणा राज्य Read More »

केस टाइटल :- अमलराज बनाम राज्य और अन्य…

Legal Update * ✴️भरण-पोषण का भुगतान न करने पर पुलिस एफआईआर दर्ज कर सकती है क्योंकि यह आर्थिक दुर्व्यवहार, डीवी अधिनियम के तहत संरक्षण आदेश का उल्लंघन है: मद्रास हाईकोर्ट ====+====+====+====+==== 🔴मद्रास हाईकोर्ट ने एक फैसले में कहा है कि भरण-पोषण का भुगतान न करना अधिनियम की धारा 18 के तहत सुरक्षा आदेश का उल्लंघन

केस टाइटल :- अमलराज बनाम राज्य और अन्य… Read More »

केस का नाम: जस्टिन टी.जे बनाम केरल राज्य

केस नं.: सीआरएल.एमसी नं. 2023 का 4508 LEGAL UPDATE एनडीपीएस: केवल नोटिस पर्याप्त नहीं, विस्तार आवेदन की सुनवाई के दौरान आरोपी की उपस्थिति अनिवार्य: केरल हाईकोर्ट 🔘 हाल के एक फैसले में, केरल हाईकोर्ट ने एनडीपीएस अधिनियम की धारा 36ए(4) के तहत दायर रिमांड के विस्तार के लिए एक आवेदन पर विचार करते समय आरोपी

केस का नाम: जस्टिन टी.जे बनाम केरल राज्य Read More »

Few Interesting Citations…

🟤 Few Interesting Citations : 🔸 Nand Lal v State of Chhattisgarh [2023] GCtR 1075 (SC)🔸Kamukayi v Union of India [2023] GCtR 946 (SC)🔸Bank of Rajasthan v VCK Shares and Stock Broking Services Ltd [2022] GCtR 1832 (SC)🔸Jalendra Padhiary v Pragati Chhotray [2018] GCtR 1576 (SC)🔸Associate Builders v DDA [2014] GCtR 1661 (SC)🔸M/s Himmatlal Agrawal

Few Interesting Citations… Read More »

Legal Facts about Whether Advocate can take brief from opposite party of his former client?

Whether Advocate can take brief from opposite party of his former client? Regulation 33 of Section II of Part VI of Bar Council of India Rules, which is said to have been violated by the Appellant, reads as under:An advocate who has, at any time, advised in connection with the institution of a suit, appeal

Legal Facts about Whether Advocate can take brief from opposite party of his former client? Read More »

Dheeraj Singh v. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority & Ors.

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Dheeraj Singh v. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority & Ors. Civil Appeal No. 4172 of 2023 DATE OF DECISION 04-07-2023 HEADNOTE WITH FULL TEXT JUDGMENT PRACTICE & PROCEDURE / LAND ACQUISITION Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Order 41 Rule 22 – Non-application of mind to cross-objections – Appellant-landowners approached reference court

Dheeraj Singh v. Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority & Ors. Read More »

• Section 313 CRPC judicial experience has shown that more often than not, the time and effort behind such an exercise put in by the trial court does not achieve the desired result. This is because either the accused elects to come forward with evasive denials or answers questions with stereotypes like false I don’t

Read More »

RAHUL vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN CMBA 20783/21 16/03/22 [ ALI JJ ]

• Section 439 CRPC Grant of bail Gravity of offence Held, that provisions of bail are neither punitive nor preventive in nature Graver the offence is alleged greater the standard of proof is required The gravity of the offence or the severity of punishment alone is not a factor to be considered while adjudicating the

RAHUL vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN CMBA 20783/21 16/03/22 [ ALI JJ ] Read More »