Uncategorized

• Consumer Protection Act, Section 2 Insurance Policy Order of Jammu and Kashmir State Consumer Redressal Commission Insured stocks were limited to those at Ranger Stock Khanyar and not the stocks at Nawab Bazar Review A review cannot be used to change the opinion or view of the Court cannot reevaluate the evidence and reach […]

• Wildlife Protection Act, Section 51 Killing of Leopard Conviction and sentence Challenged To decide, whether petitioners acted in their defence or not, nature and ferocity of animal will be relevant A tiger by nature is of dangerous ferocity as distinguished from mensurate nature like dog or a horse In case of attack by a

• Section 304 IPC PartI Appeal against conviction Murder Victim received 80% burn injuries Suicidal theory projected by the accused can absolutely be ruled out In the case of burn injuries, question of loosing conscious till the death does not arise No stains on ground or the walls about the kerosene it would not throw

🔔 Daily Current Affairs 🔔 📖

West Bengal State Electricity Board A Body Corporation v. M/s. Sevoke Properties Pvt. Ltd. F. A. 135 of 2006,D/14-11-2018. (A) Transfer of Property Act (4 of 1882), S.105-Lease- of ship Lessor-lessee relation- Possession of suit property entrusted to lessee by unregistered lease deed – Mere fact that lease was unregistered or invalid – Would not

M/s. Glock Asia-Pacific Ltd. Vs. Union of India [Arbitration Petition No. 51 of 2022] Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. 1. This is an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 for the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator by Glock Asia-Pacific Ltd.2 2. Facts: The Ministry of Home Affairs (Procurement Division)3 floated a

Trespasser cannot claim rights in property only on the ground that he raised construction after sanction of map. Court in the case of Mr. G.S.J. Shapoorjee v. Allahabad Development Authority & Ors., 2016 11 ADJ 524 has held as under:- Mere fact that map was sanctioned and thereafter constructions were raised, would make no difference

Central GST Delhi – III Vs. Delhi International Airport Ltd. [Civil Appeal No(s). 8996 of 2019] [Civil Appeal No. 2465 of 2020] [Civil Appeal No(s). 4751-4753 of 2021] S. Ravindra Bhat, J. 1. In all these appeals, orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal1 (hereafter “CESTAT”) are impugned by the service tax

• Section 311 CRPC Power to summon Section 311 provides that the Court may summon any person as a witness or to examine any person in attendance, though not summoned as a witness and Recall and re-examine any person who has already been examined This power can be exercised at any stage of any inquiry,