Uncategorized

Anil Krishnarao Apashingkar V/s The State of Maharashtra…

Rules for production, use and recording of the Tape-Recorded Evidence in Court incorporated in Criminal Manual issued by the Bombay HC“24. The Honourable the Chief Justice and Judges, with the previous approval of the Governor under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, are pleased to make the following rules regarding recording of the tape-recorded […]

Anil Krishnarao Apashingkar V/s The State of Maharashtra… Read More »

ZERO FIR…

ZERO FIR Zero FIR is an First Information Report (FIR), which can be registered by any police station, irrespective of jurisdiction, upon receiving a complaint related to a cognizable offence.o No regular FIR number is assigned at this stage.o The concerned police station registers a fresh FIR and starts the investigation on receipt of the

ZERO FIR… Read More »

Ch. Joseph v/s The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation & Others…

“Supreme Court orders reinstatement of colour-blind driver with alternate job” The Supreme Court ruled that the termination of a colour-blind driver without offering alternate employment violated binding settlements and constitutional rights. The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation (TSRTC) was directed to reinstate the appellant in a suitable non-driving role with full pay protection and 25%

Ch. Joseph v/s The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation & Others… Read More »

Legal Update…

“तलाक के मामले में पत्नी द्वारा पति पर नपुंसकता का आरोप लगाना मानहानि नहीं है: बॉम्बे हाईकोर्ट का महत्वपूर्ण फैसला” प्रस्तावनाभारतीय दंड संहिता (Indian Penal Code) की धारा 499 और 500 मानहानि (Defamation) के अपराध को परिभाषित और दंडित करती हैं। किंतु इन धाराओं में कुछ विशिष्ट “अपवाद” (Exceptions) दिए गए हैं, जो कुछ स्थितियों

Legal Update… Read More »

Harvir v/s State Of U.P.. Crl. Appeal No.- 2110 of 2014…

भारतीय दण्ड संहिता, 1860—धारा 302 सहपठित धारा 34—आर्म्स अधिनियम, 1959—धारा 25(1)(a)—दोषसिद्धि के विरुद्ध अपील—बरामदगी पंचनामा—देशी तमंचा एवं कारतूस की बरामदगी—दोष-सिद्धि निरस्त—बरामदगी पंचनामा की साक्ष्यात्मक प्रामाणिकता—जब तक अन्वेषण अधिकारी द्वारा बरामदगी की परिस्थितियों के संबंध में सुसंगत साक्ष्यात्मक बयान नहीं दिया जाता केवल बरामदगी पंचनामा को एग्ज़िबिट कर न्यायालय में प्रदर्शित कर देने मात्र सेउसे साक्ष्य

Harvir v/s State Of U.P.. Crl. Appeal No.- 2110 of 2014… Read More »

Significant Ruling by Allahabad High Court…

Significant Ruling by Allahabad High Court The Allahabad High Court has directed the removal of a government counsel from the Kanpur Development Authority (KDA) panel due to their absence in a revenue matter. Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal criticized the counsel’s absence as unacceptable and stated that if counsel has excessive workload and cannot appear in

Significant Ruling by Allahabad High Court… Read More »