Interesting Legal Facts
Interesting legal facts
Interesting Legal Facts Read More »
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA P. V. NIDHISH AND OTHERS — Appellant KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD AND ANOTHER — Respondent Criminal Appeal No(s). 309 of 2023 DATE OF DECISION:- : 28-04-2023 HEADNOTE WITH FULL TEXT JUDGMENT Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) – Sections 472 and 482 – Wakf Act, 1995 – Sections 3(ee) and 52A
• Service Law Order of recovery of excess amount passed after four years of retirement Benefit was extended to the petitioner in terms of the resolution issued by the Finance Department As such, her pay was fixed and the benefit was extended to the petitioner It is not that either employer or the employee had
Service law order- case law Read More »
• Civil Suit for declaration of title, recovery of possession and consequential relief of perpetual injunction Oral and documentary evidence adduced on behalf of plaintiff, cogent and reliable Plaintiff able to establish execution of release deed by defendant including receipt of consideration of Rs. 7 lakhs and delivery of possession of suit property by defendant
JUDGMENT ANALYSIS OF FREEDOM OF RELIGION UNDER INDIAN CONSTITUTION Nov 03, 2022 Freedom of Religion Sabarimala temple case/ Indian Young Lawyers Association vs. the State of Kerala (2018): Supreme Court Allows Women Entry into Sabarimala Temple, which it termed as a violation of women’s right to practice religion. Issue/dispute
JUDGEMENT ANALYSIS OF FREEDOM OF RELIGION UNDER INDIAN CONSTITUTION Read More »
Jitendra Nath Mishra Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.[Criminal Appeal No. 978 of 2022]Dipankar Datta, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, takes exception to an order dated 1st June, 2022 of the Allahabad High Court. The impugned order dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant under Section 14A(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Supreme Court Judgement June 2023 Read More »
ð¥ ➡️ Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Rate of Interest on the Compensation – Granting an interest of more than 8 % on the compensation amount is fully justified. Case Citation : [2016] GCtR 3369
ð¥ ➡️ Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Enhancement of Compensation – Death in an Accident – No documentary evidence of income of victim – Without any documentary evidence of income, monthly income of more than Rs. 10,000/- can be presumed – Future Prospects are to be granted in compensation – Educated Major sons are also
ð¨ ➡️ Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Compensation – Rash and negligent driving of the driver – Victim got injured – No documentary evidence of income of victim – Even if there is no documentary evidence of income of victim is there, income of more than Rs. 3700 per month can be presumed – Compensation