Vivek Kaisth & Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. [Civil Appeal Nos. 6233-6234 of 2023 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 15522-15523 of 2021] [Civil Appeal No. 6236 of 2023 @ SLP (C) No. 2464/2022] [Civil Appeal No. 6235 of 2023 @ SLP (C) No. 21162/2021] [Civil Appeal No. 6237 of 2023 @ SLP (C) No. 4873/2022] […]
Priya Indoria Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. Etc. [Criminal Appeal Nos. _______ of 2023 arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos. 11423-11426 of 2023 arising out of Diary No. 7943 of 2023] Nagarathna, J. 1. Leave granted. Bird’s Eye View of the Controversy: 2. We begin this Judgment by an illustration: A person allegedly under intoxication beats another
LEGAL UPDATE लंबे समय तक आपराधिक मुकदमा लंबित रहने पर पदोन्नति/सेवा लाभ से इनकार करना ‘दोहरा खतरा’: उड़ीसा हाईकोर्ट ⚫ उड़ीसा हाईकोर्ट ने एक महत्वपूर्ण फैसले में कहा है कि केवल आपराधिक मुकदमा लंबे समय तक लंबित रहने के कारण पदोन्नति और अन्य वैधानिक अधिकारों और सेवा लाभों से इनकार करना ‘दोहरे खतरे’ के समान
On the final day of arguments in the case pertaining to the Electoral Bonds Scheme case, the Supreme Court asked the Union Government if it was planning to amend the Companies Act to reintroduce a profit percentage-based limit on donations by Companies. The court also remarked that while it was not asking the government to
A coordinate bench cannot comment upon the discretion exercised or judgment rendered by another coordinate bench of the same strength.
÷÷÷÷÷ Legal Updade ÷÷÷÷÷ ✳️केरल हाईकोर्ट ने अपनी क्लाइंट के साथ यौन दुर्व्यवहार के आरोपी वकीलों को अग्रिम जमानत दी ===+====+====+====+=== 🔵केरल हाईकोर्ट ने हाल ही में अपनी क्लाइंट से कई मौकों पर बलात्कार और यौन शोषण करने के आरोपी दो वकीलों को अग्रिम जमानत दे दी। ⏺️ जस्टिस गोपीनाथ पी. ने इस तथ्य को
Delhi HC Justice Subramonium Prasad’s ruling in the matter of W.P.(C) 9489/2023 and CM APPLs. 38040/2023 and 44318/2023 has stirred a complex debate, raising concerns about the intricate balance between the fundamental rights of borrowers and the interests of depositors, as well as the overarching stability of the economy. A striking concern emerges from the
Top Interesting Landmark Judgements(SC) Every Advocates Needs To Know About The SC held section 66A of the Information Technology Act which allows the arrest for offensive content which is posted through the internet as unconstitutional and hence, struck down by the impugned section. The Court recognized rights of the transgender as third genders. Also, ordered
Top Interesting Landmark Judgements (SC)… Read More »
Even though the Supreme Court refrained from granting legal recognition for same-sex marriages, it did make a strong call to the State to take steps to end the discrimination faced by queer couples and to ensure protection for their right to cohabitation.The Court clearly observed that the discrimination faced by the queer community due to
