admin_nupur

AIR 2000 BOMBAY 18 Chandrakant Bhogilal Gohil, v. Parushottam Mohanlal Makwana and others, Suit. No. 1873 of 1985, D/- 26-4-1999. (A) Limitation Act (36 of 1963), Art. 54 -Suit for specific performance-Limita- tion-Contract for sale of flat-Time not essence of contract- Payment in instal- ment paid till period of 3 years from date of contract- […]

S. Narahari & Ors. Vs. S.R. Kumar & Ors. [Civil Appeal No._ of 2023 SLP (Civil) No._ of 2023 Diary No. 23775 of 2022] Krishna Murari, J. In the said Will, among other things, it was stated that both the legatees were to enjoy the suit property during their entire lifetime, and thereafter, the same

Hari Prakash Shukla & Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. [Civil Appeal No(s). 9697-9698 of 2014] Hari Prakash Shukla & Anr. Vs. Prakhar Mishra & Anr.Contemnor(S)/Respondent(S) [Contempt Petition (Civil) No(s). 209-210 of 2021] Krishna Murari, J. Facts Analysis I. Whether the relief granted in the Judgment of Banwasi Seva Ashram vs State Of

Legal update 🅾️सोशल मीडिया संदेश फॉरवर्ड करने वाला व्यक्ति इसकी सामग्री के लिए उत्तरदायी: मद्रास हाईकोर्ट ने एसवी शेखर के खिलाफ आपराधिक मामले रद्द करने से इनकार किया 🟩मद्रास हाईकोर्ट ने हाल ही में महिला पत्रकारों के खिलाफ अपमानजनक टिप्पणी के लिए अभिनेता और भाजपा नेता एसवी शेखर के खिलाफ शुरू की गई आपराधिक कार्यवाही

×××××× Legal Update ×××××× ✳️एमवी एक्ट | सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने 75% विकलांग हो चुके पीड़ित के मुआवजे को बढ़ाया, विवाह की संभावना के नुकसान पर मुआवजा दिया ====+====+====+====+==== 🔴सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने एक मोटर वाहन दुर्घटना पीड़ित, जिसके पूरे शरीर पर 75% चोट लगी थी, को 2.3 लाख रुपये की पिछली राशि से बढ़ाकर 15.9 लाख

• Transfer of Property Act, Section 100 Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act Section 3(b) Order of attachment before judgment A court can only recognize and declare a charge which preexists Petitioners have no claim over the petition schedule property, except a plea for the creation of a charge for the amount claimed towards their marriage

🟡 Some Useful and Interesting Citations

(2013) 1 Supreme Court Cases 243 BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED Vs R.S. AVTAR SINGH AND COMPANY A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Or. 21 Rr. 1(1), (4) and (5) r/w S. 34 – Execution of money decree – Payment of interest – Part-payment of decretal amount deposited in court pursuant to its orders – Principle

(2013) 2 Supreme Court Cases 114 U. SREE Vs U. SRINIVAS A. Family and Personal Laws – Hindu Law – Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Ss. 13(1)(i-a) and 23 – “Mental cruelty” – question whether wife treated her husband with – Proof – Husband used to practice and learn music in presence of his father,

Service matter. Charge sheet in disciplinary matter to an employee can not be quashed during inquiry Charge sheet cannot generally be a subject matter of challenge as it does not adversely affect the rights of the delinquent unless it is established that the same has been issued by an authority not competent to initiate the