2023 CRI. L. J. 2203AIROnline 2023 AP 151(ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT) Majji Parvathamma v. Majji Vasantha Rao and another. Criminal Revision Case 1885 of 2008, D.4-4-2023. Penal Code (45 of 1860), S. 498-A – Dowry Prohibition Act (28 of 1961), S. 4- Evidence Act (1 of 1872), S. 3 Cruelty -Proof-Accused along with co-accused persons […]
Majji Parvathamma v. Majji Vasantha Rao and another. Read More »
2023 (2) KCCR 1432KARNATAKA HIGH COURT(KALABURAGI BENCH) Basheer Ahmed and OthersVersusBasheer Hussain through LRS Regular Second Appeal No. 7345 of 2011, decided on 28.9.2022 SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963-Section 34-Suit for declaration- Granted land-Dispute as to title in respect of-Endorsement alleged to have been issued by Tahsildar showing grant in favour of plaintiff found to be
Basheer Ahmed and OthersVersus Basheer Hussain through LRS Read More »
2023 (2) KCCR 1444KARNATAKA HIGH COURT(KALABURAGI BENCH) Gangabai and AnotherVersusShaaradabai Regular Second Appeal No. 200289 of 2021, decided on 31.10.2022 HINDU LAW-Partition-Suit for-Dispute between sisters- Plaintiffs claiming that their mother died intestate and therefore they are entitled for their share in their mother’s property- Defendant claiming her mother had executed Will and bequeathing suit property
Gangabai and Another Versus Shaaradabai Read More »
2023 (2) KCR SN 162 (SC)SUPREME COURT OF INDIA(Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) (From the High Court of Punjab and Haryana) Ravinder Kumar GoelVersusState of Haryana and Others Civil Appeal No. 1173 of 2023 with 1176 of 2023 etc. etc., decided on 15.2.2023 A. LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894-Section 23-Determination of market value-Circular providing for floor rates-Supreme Court
Ravinder Kumar Goel Versus State of Haryana and Others Read More »
Amendment of plaint – An amendment, that is mala fide or not made in good faith, should never be granted. (2023(1) Civil Court Cases 595 (Allahabad) Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O.13.R.4 – Admissibility of document – Objection as to admissibility of a document on the ground of sufficiency of stamp has to be raised when
अनाधिकृत धन-निकासी—जनता पेटीएम, गूगल पे, एमेज़ॉन पे आदि जैसे भुगतान माध्यमों का उपयोग करते हैं तो वे भी तीसरे पक्ष (हैकर्स) द्वारा धोखाधड़ी की गतिविधि से प्रभावित हो सकते हैं—पेटीएम द्वारा अनाधिकृत धन-निकासी के मामलों में उपभोक्ता की गलती साबित करना आवश्यक है—रिज़र्व बैंक ऑफ इण्डिया के दिशा-निर्देश ग्राहकों के अनुकूल हैं और यदि ग्राहक
Dr. R. Pavithra v/s The Commissioner of Police 28 April 2023 # W.P(Cri.)No.-6789 of 2021 Read More »
