VARSHA vs STATE of MP CRLA 1021/22 08/08/22 [ Dhananjaya JJ ]
• Section 311 CRPC Power to summon Section 311 provides that the Court may summon any person as a witness or to examine any person in attendance, though not summoned as a witness and Recall and re-examine any person who has already been examined This power can be exercised at any stage of any inquiry,
VARSHA vs STATE of MP CRLA 1021/22 08/08/22 [ Dhananjaya JJ ] Read More »
Gurjit singh v/s State of Punjab
मात्र इसलिए कि एक आरोपी को आईपीसी की धारा 498-ए के अपराध के तहत दोषी पाया जाता है और मृत्यु विवाह के सात वर्षों की अवधि के भीतर हुई है, आरोपी को साक्ष्य अधिनियम की धारा 113 ए के अन्तर्गत उपधारणा करके आईपीसी की धारा 306 के तहत दंडनीय अपराध के लिए स्वतः दोषी नहीं
Gurjit singh v/s State of Punjab Read More »
Ghanshyam Vs. Yogendra Rathi/[Civil Appeal Nos. 7527-7528 of 2012]
Ghanshyam Vs. Yogendra Rathi [Civil Appeal Nos. 7527-7528 of 2012] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. Heard Shri Rajul Shrivastav, learned counsel for the defendant-appellant. None appeared for the plaintiffrespondent despite service. 2. After having lost from all the three courts below, the defendant to the suit has preferred this appeal. 3. The plaintiff-respondent instituted a suit for eviction of
Ghanshyam Vs. Yogendra Rathi/[Civil Appeal Nos. 7527-7528 of 2012] Read More »
Babita vs STATE OF HARYANA CRMM 17111/22 13/05/22 [ VIKAS JJ ]
• Section 306 IPC Abetment to suicide Plea of harassment Husband committed suicide due to alleged bad conduct of his wife In case husband was feeling harassed or mentally disturbed due to alleged illicit relationship of his wife or her bad behaviour and conduct, then harassment and mental disturbance would not constitute offence of abetment
Babita vs STATE OF HARYANA CRMM 17111/22 13/05/22 [ VIKAS JJ ] Read More »
Gohar Mohammad vs State Of UP CA 9322/22 15/12/22 [ J.K. Maheshwari JJ ]
• Motor Vehicles Act In case the claimant(s) or legal representative(s) of the deceased have filed separate claim petition(s) in the territorial jurisdiction of different High Courts, in the said situation, the first claim petition filed by the claimant(s)/legal representative(s) shall be maintained by the said Claims Tribunal and the subsequent claim petition(s) shall stand
Gohar Mohammad vs State Of UP CA 9322/22 15/12/22 [ J.K. Maheshwari JJ ] Read More »
Salim vs State Of Rajasthan CRLA 334/1992 20/01/23 [ VIJAY JJ ]
• Sections 302 and 34 IPC Appeal against conviction Murder Alleged that accused persons armed with lathis and stones forcibly entered into complainants house with common intention and started assaulted him, his father and mother with lathis and stones Injuries are ante mortem in nature Only one fatal injury was caused on the head of
Salim vs State Of Rajasthan CRLA 334/1992 20/01/23 [ VIJAY JJ ] Read More »
POCSO Act,Case law
• POCSO ACT Section 6 read with Section 5(i), (m) and (r) Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, Section 4 Appeal against acquittal Sexual assault upon minor Prosecution proved beyond any doubt that on date and time of incident, victim child was subjected to grave and heinous sexual assault and she was smothered
POCSO Act,Case law Read More »

