admin_nupur

Supreme Court slams Tripura Govt — can’t change recruitment rules mid-game! The Supreme Court held that the State of Tripura cannot cancel an ongoing recruitment process based on a new executive policy. Executive instructions cannot override statutory rules, and changing selection criteria after the process has begun is arbitrary and violates candidates’ legitimate expectations. Court:Supreme […]

Supreme Court exempts vehicles used in restricted Industrial areas from road tax. The Supreme Court held that motor vehicles used exclusively within the enclosed and restricted premises of Visakhapatnam Steel Plant (RINL) do not constitute use in a “public place” and are hence exempt from motor vehicle tax under the AP Taxation Act, 1963. Court:Supreme

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ANR. V. SMT. PRABHA JAIN & ORS. [2025] 2 S.C.R. 263 : 2025 INSC 95 The issue which arose in the present case was Whether the jurisdiction of a civil court to try a suit is completely barred by S-34 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002? The SC held that the  SARFAESI Act

✅ Weekly Legal Updates (25th August – 30th August 2025) 📌 Khem Singh (D) Through LRS v. State of Uttaranchal (Now State of Uttarakhand) & Another Etc, 2025 SCThe Supreme Court ruled that a victim’s legal heirs can continue prosecuting an appeal against acquittal under Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) if

Madras High Court quashed interim maintenance of Rs. 30,000 to the wife under Section 24 HMA, holding she had sufficient independent income and assets, while sustaining maintenance for the minor son; By : Sakshi Update: 2025-08-28. Madras HC: No Interim Maintenance if Wife Has Own Income & Property The Madras High Court has ruled that

✅ Daily Legal Updates 📌 Glencore International AG v. M/s. Shree Ganesh Metals and another, 2025 SCThe Supreme Court has held that an arbitration agreement need not be signed to be enforceable if the parties otherwise demonstrate mutual consent—via written conduct such as emails—setting aside the Delhi High Court’s refusal to refer the dispute to

Specific performance. If only the power of attorney holder gives evidence for the plaintiff, it cannot be said that the plaintiff has been willing and ready to perform his part of the contract. If willingness and readiness are not proved , suit for specific performance cannot be decreed. Suit dismissed. 2025 ALR 169 page 405.

Maintenance it is well-settled that income tax returns do not necessarily furnish an accurate guide of the real income. Particularly, when parties are engaged in a matrimonial conflict, there is a tendency to underestimate income. Hence, it is for the Family Court to determine on a holistic assessment of the evidence what would be the

Supreme Court enforces Arbitration Clause in unsigned contract, reverses Delhi HC ruling. The Supreme Court held that a valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties based on their conduct and email correspondence, despite the contract not being signed by one party. The disputes must be referred to arbitration in London. Court: Supreme Court of India