Divya Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition (C) No. 724 of 2023] [Writ Petition (C) No. 705 of 2023] [Writ Petition (C) No. 764 of 2023] K.V. Viswanathan, J. 1. These writ petitions raise questions involving the interpretation of the Office Memoranda [OM] dated 19.01.2019 and 31.01.2019 prescribing the eligibility for the Economically […]
Commissioner, Customs Central Excise and Service Tax, Patna Vs. M/s. Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 3991/2023] Union of India & Ors. Vs. M/s. Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd. [Civil Appeal No. 3992/2023] Dipankar Datta, J. Preface 1. We are tasked to decide two civil appeals that centre around
Interesting legal facts about SOCIAL JUSTICE :
Interesting legal facts about SOCIAL JUSTICE… Read More »
The Delhi High Court on Thursday refused to confirm the death penalty awarded to Ariz Khan, who was convicted by a trial court in the 2008 Batla house encounter case in which Delhi Police’s inspector Mohan Chand Sharma was killed.division bench of Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice Amit Sharma however upheld the trial court order
÷÷÷÷÷÷ Legal Updade ÷÷÷÷÷ 🅾️पत्नी के पास उच्च शिक्षा की डिग्री होना उसे भरण-पोषण के अधिकार से वंचित करने का आधार नहीं हो सकता: मध्य प्रदेश हाईकोर्ट ====+====+====+====+=== 🟡मध्य प्रदेश हाईकोर्ट ने पिछले सप्ताह कहा कि यदि पत्नी के पास उच्च शिक्षा की डिग्री है तो यह उसे भरण-पोषण के अधिकार से वंचित करने का
Ranjan Kumar Chadha Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh [Criminal Appeal Nos. 2239-2240 of 2011] J.B. Pardiwala, J.: 1. The captioned appeals are at the instance of a convict accused of the offence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, “the NDPS Act”) and are directed against the judgment and
◆ श्रेणी ‘क’ के अपराध, जिनमें 7 वर्ष या उससे कम सज़ा का प्रावधान है, में प्रक्रिया :— न्यायालय में आरोप-पत्र (Charge-sheet)/परिवाद-पत्र (Complaint Case) प्रस्तुत किये जाने के बाद ज़मानत हेतु प्रक्रिया—(i) सामान्यतः सम्मन जारी होने के पश्चात अधिवक्ता के माध्यम से उपस्थिति अनुमन्य(ii) यदि अभियुक्त सम्मन जारी होने के बाद भी उपस्थित ना हो
Satender Kumar Antil v/s C.B.I. SLP No. 5191 Of 2021… Read More »
In Divaji Vs. Daddi & Others, A.I. R., 1988, S.C. 845, the Supreme Court has held that proviso (c) of S. 12 departs from the Hindu General Law and makes it clear that the adopted child shall not divest any person of any estate which has vested in him or her before the adoption. (c) Changes Made
Divaji Vs. Daddi & Others, A.I. R., 1988, SC… Read More »
