The Supreme Court on Wednesday (18.10.2023) allowed a woman with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) Syndrome, a condition that prevents her from producing eggs, to undergo surrogacy using a donor egg. The Apex Court did so, by staying the operation of a recent amendment to the Surrogacy Rules, with respect to the petitioner. The amendment introduced in March […]
The Supreme Court today (16.10.2023) rejected the plea of a married woman to abort her third pregnancy which has crossed 26-week on the ground that she was suffering from post partum psychosis after her previous delivery in September 2022. The order was passed by a bench comprising CJI DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice
Interesting legal facts about REFUGEE :
Interesting legal facts about REFUGEE… Read More »
X Vs. Union of India and Anr. [Miscellaneous Application No. 2157 of 2023] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1137 of 2023] Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI Table of Contents A. Facts and procedural history …………. 3 B. The medical termination of pregnancies …………… 10 C. Analysis ………………….. 15 i. The jurisdiction of this Court to hear
C.I.T., Delhi Vs. Bharti Hexacom Ltd.[Civil Appeal No(S). 11128 of 2016][Civil Appeal No(S). 4902/2022][Civil Appeal No(S). 162/2018][Civil Appeal No(S). 159/2021][Civil Appeal No(S). 4839/2017][Civil Appeal No(S). 153/2021][Civil Appeal No(S). 6897/2018][Civil Appeal No(S)._______ of 2023 @ SLP (C)______ of 2023 @ Diary No(S). 4178/2019][Civil Appeal No(S)._______ of 2023 @ SLP (C) No. 24740/2019][Civil Appeal No(S)._______ of 2023
C.I.T., Delhi Vs. Bharti Hexacom Ltd… Read More »
• Order 16, Rule 1 CPC Summoning of witnesses not named in the list of witnesses Respondents/Plaintiffs want to prove that the transaction in question is that of sale It is the case of the Respondents/Plaintiffs that the developers of the building (two additional witnesses sought to be examined) are confirming parties to the Agreement
Dinesh vs Vinod WP 11185/22 25/01/23 [ SANDEEP JJ ] [ BOMBAY HIGH COURT ].. Read More »
State of Rajasthan Vs. Gautam S/o. Mohanlal [Criminal Appeal No. 3168 of 2023 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 11331 of 2019] Abhay S. Oka, J. 1. Leave granted. Factual Aspects 2. This is a case which shocks the conscience of the Court. The only issue in this case is regarding the enhancement of the sentence imposed
