admin_nupur

• POCSO ACT Section 6 Section 376(2)(f)(i)(j) and 506 Penetrative sexual assault Acquittal -Benefit of Doubt – The appellant, stepfather to ‘S’, was convicted for sexually assaulting and raping her – The incident was reported to the police by ‘S’, her grandmother, and cousin – The appeal challenges the conviction and sentence, questioning the fairness […]

2013 ACJ 2215 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM [W.P. (C) No. 9963 of 2012; decided on 20.12.2012) VibinVersusState of Kerala and others 📌Constitution of India, Articles 226 and 21 Writ Maintainability of Right to life and personal liberty-Violation of Police atrocity-Compensation- Liability of State Sovereign immunity-A lawyer was returning home on his

माननीय सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने इलेक्टोरल बॉन्ड केस में भारतीय स्टेट बैंक (एसबीआई) को जमकर फटकार लगाई. सर्वोच्च अदालत ने इस दौरान न सिर्फ एसबीआई की याचिका खारिज कर दी बल्कि कड़े शब्दों में चेताया कि अगर 12 मार्च 2024 तक उसे बैंक की ओर से डिटेल नहीं दी गई तो देश की सबसे बड़ी अदालत

LATEST LANDMARK JUDGMENTS IN CRIMINAL LAW 1. Lalita Kumari v. State of UP : FIR mandatory in cognizable cases 2. Mohd. Ahmad Khan vs Shah Bano Begum : Section 125 of CrPC Secular 3. D.K. Basu v. State of Bengal : SC guidelines relating to rights of the arrested person 4. Nilabati Bahera v. State

Section 138 and 139 of N.I.Act. Prosecution of dishonour of cheque initiated by holder of cheque in due course. Cheque was drawn by accused No.1 in favour of accused No.2 for amount of Rs. One lakh towards discharge of some debt incurred by accused No.1 towards accused No.2–Accused No.2 had some transaction with applicant No.3

• Section 409 IPC Criminal breach of trust The petitioner was accused of misappropriating Rs. 1,25,000/meant for Kisan Vikas Patras after a MACT award The petitioner was convicted for the offence under Section 409 of IPC and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and a fine The petitioner challenges the conviction and sentence, asserting that the money