admin_nupur

The Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. Vs. M. Rama Rao & Ors. Etc. [Civil Appeal Nos._______ of 2023 @ SLP (C) Nos. 34255-34256 of 2015] Vikram Nath, J. 1. Leave granted 2. Despite service of notice, none of the respondents have put in appearance as such the matter has been heard ex parte. 3. […]

Ghanshyam Vs. Yogendra Rathi [Civil Appeal Nos. 7527-7528 of 2012] Pankaj Mithal, J. 1. Heard Shri Rajul Shrivastav, learned counsel for the defendant-appellant. None appeared for the plaintiffrespondent despite service. 2. After having lost from all the three courts below, the defendant to the suit has preferred this appeal. 3. The plaintiff-respondent instituted a suit for eviction of

Bar Council of India Vs. Rabi Sahu & Anr. [Civil Appeal No. 8571 of 2013] Sanjay Kumar, J. 1. Bar Council of India (BCI) is in appeal against the order dated 21.09.2012 passed by a Division Bench of the Orissa High Court in W.P.(C). No. 32506 of 2011. By the said order, BCI was directed to

Salem Muslim Burial Ground Protection Committee Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. Waqf. Gazette publication by Waqf Board is not conclusive proof of immovable property being wakf property. If disputed waqf to be proved. Gazette is like an advertisement and nothing more. It may be noted that Wakf Board is a statutory authority under

• UP Panchayat Raj Act, Section 12C Election petition Order passed directing for recounting of votes Order of recounting cannot be passed only for the sake of it and on the basis of vague allegation without specifying any particular irregularity in counting as well as how it would affect election result materially In the present

🔔 Daily Current Affairs 🔔 📖

किशोर अपचारी भी अग्रिम ज़मानत याचिका दायर करने का हक़दार है—धारा 438, दं०प्र०सं० में ऐसा कोई भी प्रतिबन्ध नहीं है जो एक किशोर अपचारी को अग्रिम ज़मानत याचिका दायर करने से रोके—एक किशोर अपचारी को भी अन्य व्यक्तियों के साथ समान अधिकार प्राप्त हैं—किशोर न्याय अधिनियम, 2015 की धारा 15 के तहत जघन्य अपराध की

Adverse possession. A case for adverse possession cannot be established by oral testimony alone. Adverse possession can not be claimed through compromise or through mere admission. Without documentary evidence adverse possession cannot be claimed. A suit for adverse possession could not have been decreed on the basis of either a compromise or an admission because

📌📌CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908-Section 100-Second appeal- concurrent findings-Plaintiffs was married to defendant No.1-Had divorced Gulavva in 1958-At the time he had executed a registered maintenance deed on 16.03.1958 (Ex.P4)-Gulavva was given a life interest in respect of suit properties in lieu of maintenance-Gulavva sold it on 14.07.2008-Purchasers filed four suits, which were clubbed and heard

जहां माता-पिता अपने में से किसी एक को बच्चे की कस्टडी देने के लिए सहमत हों, वहां कोर्ट तब हस्तक्षेप कर सकता है, जब कि कस्टडी नाबालिग के हित में ना रह गई हो : राजस्थान हाईकोर्ट ⚫ राजस्थान हाईकोर्ट ने माना कि ऐसे मामलों में जहां पक्षों ने माता-पिता में से किसी एक को