admin_nupur

Supreme Court of IndiaDate of Judgment:- 28-07-2025CHIRAG SEN AND ANOTHER ETC. Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER Title :- SC Quashes Criminal Case Against Badminton Players Chirag and Lakshya Sen Over Alleged Age Fraud The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against national badminton players Chirag Sen and Lakshya Sen, their parents, and coach, arising from […]

“Supreme Court Rules Commuting Accidents Covered Under Employment Compensation” The Supreme Court held that accidents occurring while commuting to or from work are deemed to arise out of and in the course of employment under the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923, provided a nexus between the accident and employment is established. The Court reversed the High

Whether forest officials are liable to pay damages if seized property was damaged due to their negligence?In the present case, the plaintiff seeks damages on the count that on account of the negligence on the part of the defendants the teakwood to which he was entitled has been damaged/decayed. It cannot be disputed that after

⚖️ 1. Legal Basis: Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC Under Order XXXIX, Rule 4 CPC, any party aggrieved by an ex parte injunction may apply to the same court to have it discharged, varied, or set aside if: 📝 2. Grounds to Vacate Ex Parte Order False/misleading statements in the plaintiff’s pleadings or affidavit or concealment of

📘 CPC Order 1 Rule 10 – पक्षकारों को जोड़ना या हटाना 🔹 ⚖️ क्या है Order 1 Rule 10?यह नियम न्यायालय को यह अधिकार देता है कि वह मामले में किसी पक्षकार (Plaintiff या Defendant) को जोड़ या हटाकर न्याय करने में सहायता कर सके। 📌 मुख्य बिंदु:1️⃣ अगर कोई जरूरी व्यक्ति (necessary party)

✅ Daily Legal Updates 📌 M/S. Airen and Associates v. M/S. Sanmar Engineering Services Limited, 2025 SCSupreme Court observed that “acknowledgment of partial debt would not extend the limitation period for the entire debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963” while upholding the Chhattisgarh High Court’s decision in a debt recovery case. 📌

📝 Recent Landmark Judgments (2025 – 2023) MUST READ ◾ 1. X v. State Officer, Rajasthan 2025 Rajasthan High CourtA pregnant minor victim (rape survivor) has the exclusive right to decide whether to continue or terminate the pregnancy, especially if she has sufficient understanding. ◾ 2. Rakhi Sadhukhan v. Raju Sadhukhan 2025A woman living with

Six Conditions To Grant Mandatory Injunction Case Name – Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority and Ors. v. Niramala Devi 2025 INSC 843 i) Obligation: There must be a clear obligation on the part of the defendant.ii) Breach: A breach of that obligation must have occurred or be reasonably apprehendediii) Necessity : It must be

Vibhor Garg V. Neha (2025 SC) Part 1: Summary of law u/s.122 IEA- SC relied upon the following judgments-

“हर वैवाहिक विवाद अपराध नहीं होता: पत्नी के रंग को लेकर पति की तानों को ‘क्रूरता’ नहीं माना जा सकता – बॉम्बे हाईकोर्ट” परिचय:भारत में वैवाहिक जीवन से जुड़े विवादों को लेकर दायर की जाने वाली शिकायतें अक्सर घरेलू हिंसा और क्रूरता (Cruelty) के आरोपों की श्रेणी में आती हैं। हालांकि, हर असहमति, तर्क-वितर्क या