\u2b50BomHC-S.143-A NI Act-Authorized Signatory Of Cheque, Not Being Drawer, Cannot Be Directed To Pay Interim Compensation-Lyka Labs Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra-08.03.2023.*_<\/p>\n\n\n\n
SC-Filing Incomplete Chargesheet Without Completing Investigation Would Not Extinguish The Right Of Accused To Get Default Bail-Para 33-Ritu Chhabaria Vs. UOI & Ors-26.04.2023.*_<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u2b50SC: S.49 Proviso – Registration Act – Unregistered Agreement Relating to Sale Of Immovable Property Can Be Received In Evidence In A Suit For Specific Performance-10.04.2023- Case: R. Hemalatha Vs. Kashthuri.*_<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u2b50SC: Judicial Officers protected from prosecution.*_<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Interim order issued that no crime or criminal case shall be registered against a Judicial Officer in respect of anything allegedly done or purported to be done in the discharge of his duty or his capacity as holder of such judicial office without prior permission of the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Case:<\/em> Citation:<\/em> \u2b50SC: Courts of law may also take judicial notice of the practice prevailing in such businesses as shares trading when dealing with such cases.*_<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3. The Second Respondent herein was a member of Stock Exchange. The transactions in relation to the Stock Exchange are regulated by the statutes and statutory rules. If in terms of the provisions of a statute, a member of a Stock Exchange is required to maintain books of accounts in a particular manner, he would be required to do so, as non-compliance of the mandatory provisions of the Rules may entail punishment. It is not in dispute that transactions comprising purchases and sales of shares by investors is a matter of confidence. Both parties would have to rely upon one another. For the said purpose, the Courts of law may also take judicial notice of the practice prevailing in such business.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Case:<\/em> Citation:<\/em> ⭐BomHC-S.143-A NI Act-Authorized Signatory Of Cheque, Not Being Drawer, Cannot Be Directed To Pay Interim Compensation-Lyka Labs Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra-08.03.2023.*_ SC-Filing Incomplete Chargesheet Without Completing Investigation Would Not Extinguish The Right Of Accused To Get Default Bail-Para 33-Ritu Chhabaria Vs. UOI & Ors-26.04.2023.*_ ⭐SC: S.49 Proviso – Registration Act – Unregistered Agreement Relating […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3349","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n
UP Judicial Officers’Assn Vs. UOI<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
(1944) 4 SCC 687.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
MS Narayan Menon Vs. State of Kerala<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
AIR 2006 (SC) 3366.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"