Supreme Court of India<\/p>\n\n\n\n
P. Shyamala vs Gundlur Masthan on 24 February, 2023<\/p>\n\n\n\n
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1363-1364 OF 2023<\/p>\n\n\n\n
specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 09.05.2012. In the agreement to sell, the late mother of the appellant agreed to sell the suit property for a total sale consideration of Rs. 23,00,000\/-, against which an advance of Rs. 8,00,000\/- was paid by the plaintiff. 2.1 That the trial Court passed an ex-parte judgment and decree on 12.10.2013 and passed a decree for specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 9.5.2012. While decreeing the suit, the trial Court directed the respondent \u2013 original plaintiff to deposit the balance sale consideration of Rs. 15,00,000\/- within two weeks before the trial Court. The trial Court also observed that in case the defendant fails to execute the sale deed on receiving the balance of sale consideration, the plaintiff is at liberty to get it done through process of law. Therefore, under the decree dated 12.10.2013, the plaintiff was required to deposit Rs. 15,00,000\/- within a period of two weeks from the judgment and decree dated 12.10.2013. Thus, as per the judgment and decree dated 12.10.2013, the respondent \u2013 original plaintiff was required to pay\/deposit the balance sale consideration of Rs. 15,00,000\/- on or before 21.10.2013. However, the respondent herein \u2013 original plaintiff failed to pay\/deposit the balance sale consideration as ordered by the trial Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
After a period of 853 days from the date of judgment and decree dated 12.10.2013 passed by the trial Court, the original plaintiff \u2013 respondent herein filed an application before the trial Court under Section 148 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, \u2018CPC\u2019) and Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act being I.A. No. 732\/2016 in O.S. No. 291\/2013 and prayed for extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration which the plaintiff was required to deposit on or before 21.10.2013, as per the judgment and decree dated 12.10.2013<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Simultaneously, the appellant, being the legal representative of the original defendant, filed an application being I.A. No. 914\/2017 in O.S. No. 291\/2013 under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 to rescind the Agreement to Sell dated 9.5.2012.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
By common order dated 29.06.2019, the trial Court allowed I.A. No. 732\/2016 directing the plaintiff to deposit the balance sale consideration of Rs. 15,00,000\/- with interest @ 18% per annum from the date of decree, i.e., 12.10.2013 till the date of deposit, within one month. Consequently, the trial Court dismissed I.A. No. 914\/2017 filed by the appellant under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is further submitted that even the equity is also in favour of the appellant. It is submitted that after the ex-parte judgment and decree, in the year 2013 the prices of the agricultural land in question have gone up to Rs. 3 crores<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, both these appeals succeed
I.A. No. 732\/2016 filed by the plaintiff under Section 148 CPC and Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act seeking extension of time with a huge delay of 853 days to deposit the balance sale consideration stands dismissed. I.A. No. 914\/2017 filed by the appellant \u2013 defendant under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act to rescind the agreement to sell dated 09.05.2012 on non-payment of\/deposit of the balance sale consideration by the plaintiff, which the plaintiff was required to deposit\/pay within a period of two weeks from the date of ex-parte judgment and decree dated 12.10.2013, stands allowed. Agreement to sell dated 09.05.2012 stands rescinded in exercise of powers under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act. However, the appellant herein is directed to refund the amount of Rs. 8,00,000\/- to the plaintiff with 12% interest from 09.05.2012 till the actual payment, within a period of six weeks from today, failing which it shall carry interest @ 18% per annum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Supreme Court of India P. Shyamala vs Gundlur Masthan on 24 February, 2023 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1363-1364 OF 2023 specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 09.05.2012. In the agreement to sell, the late mother of the appellant agreed to sell the suit property for a total sale consideration of Rs. 23,00,000\/-, against which […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n