KARNATAKA HIGH COURT State of KarnatakaVersusSajumon alias Saju Criminal Appellant No. 1266 of 2019, decided on 25.11.2019 PENAL CODE, 1860-Sections 302, 304-Circumstantial evidence Respondent reasonable doubt-On close reading of the materials, which have been produced before the Court below would clearly go to show that the entire case rests on circumstantial evidence. There are no …
2019 (2) TLNJ 407 Rajeswari vs Kannan Date of Judgment: 30.04.2019 Hindu Marriage Act, Section 28 – Divorce by wife on the grounds of cruelty and desertion – alleging that husband not employed, borrowed all over the village and refused to heed the requirements of the appellant and children – Petition dismissed. In the appeal …
2019 (3)CTC 596 Union of India Vs Parmar Construction Company Date of Judgment29-3-2019 Section 11 (6), 12(5), 21 &26 (As amended by Arbitration and conciliation Amendment) Act 2015 (3 of 2016) Retrospective application of 2015 Amendment Act to pending proceedings -When Maintainable 2015 Amendment Act came in to force on 23-102015 – The Amendment Act …
2019(5) SCC 360 Vijay Hathising Shah and anr. Vs. Gitaben Parshottamdas Mukhi and ors. Date of Judgment : 25.02.2019 Application filed by the 1st respondent for amendment of plaint in the partition suit rejected by the trial court – High court allowed it by impugned order – On appeal it is Held that, the trial …
Vijay Hathising Shah and anr. Vs. Gitaben Parshottamdas Mukhi and ors. Read More »
वन अधिनियम 1927 की धारा 52 में वाहनों को राजसात करने का खेल ममूली कीमत की वन उपज फिर भी लाखों के वाहन राजसातमप्र राज्य। भारतीय वन अधिनियम 1927 की धारा 52 में राज्य सरकार के संषोधनों के कारण वाहनों को राजसात किया जाता हैं। अधिनियम 1927 के अंतर्गत बनाए गए नियमों में भी राजसात …
