महेश कुमार बनाम राज्य (एनसीटी ऑफ दिल्ली)

जमानत: प्रारंभिक प्रेम संबंधों, विशेष रूप से किशोर प्रेम के प्रति दृष्टिकोण, वास्तविक जीवन स्थितियों की पृष्ठभूमि के संदर्भ में होना चाहिए: दिल्ली हाईकोर्टMay 10, 2023Justice Swarana Kanta Sharmaहाल के एक फैसले में, दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट ने किशोर प्रेम से जुड़े मामलों में जमानत देते या खारिज करते समय सावधानी और सावधानीपूर्वक विचार करने की आवश्यकता

महेश कुमार बनाम राज्य (एनसीटी ऑफ दिल्ली) Read More »

Ghanshyam Vs. Yogendra Rathi Will Or General Power Of Attorney (GPA) Cannot Confer Title In Immovable Property during life time of the executant. Such documents are not documents of transfer of title. It goes without saying that the power of attorney executed by the Defendant-Appellant is of no consequence as on the strength of said

Read More »

एचपी राज्य बनाम सीता देवीC W P No. 647/2020Dicision date 12/06/2023

÷÷÷÷÷÷ Legal Update ÷÷÷÷÷ ☸️मातृत्व अवकाश एक मौलिक मानव अधिकार है, इससे इनकार करना संविधान के अनुच्छेद 29, 39 का उल्लंघन : हिमाचल प्रदेश हाईकोर्ट ====+====+====+====+==== 🟢 हिमाचल प्रदेश हाईकोर्ट ने दोहराया कि प्रत्येक महिला, चाहे उसकी रोजगार स्थिति कुछ भी हो, मातृत्व अवकाश की हकदार है। कोर्ट ने कहा कि मातृत्व अवकाश का उद्देश्य

एचपी राज्य बनाम सीता देवीC W P No. 647/2020Dicision date 12/06/2023 Read More »

Legal news

CBIC Guidelines on Summons, Arrest and Bail under GST Lawnews detailsIn any tax law including the GST law, tax evasion as well as detection and investigation both are present and go hand-in-hand. It is obvious that tax evasion ought to be curbed at all costs and this may require severe and harsh action on the

Legal news Read More »

Bharat Bhushan and Anr. V. State of Madhya Pradesh.

Sheila Sebastian v. R. Jawaharaj and Anr. Etc. N.V.Sharma Vs. Union of India. Mahesh Kumar V. State of Haryana. .SC: Cruelty – Participation – Not participating in settlement of dowry dispute – Cannot be construed as cruelty and harassment. .Indian Penal Code 1860 – Section 498A – Cruelty and harassment – Appellants 2 and 4

Bharat Bhushan and Anr. V. State of Madhya Pradesh. Read More »

Gosu Jairami Reddy & Anr. v. State of A. PWITHGosu Ramachandra Reddy & Ors. v. State of A. P

AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 3147(From: Andhra Pradesh)* Criminal Appeal Nos. 1321 with 1327 of 2006,D. 6-7-2011. Gosu Jairami Reddy & Anr. v. State of A. PWITHGosu Ramachandra Reddy & Ors. v. State of A. P (A) Constitution of India, Art. 136- Appeal by special leave – Is not an ordinary or regular appeal against an

Gosu Jairami Reddy & Anr. v. State of A. PWITHGosu Ramachandra Reddy & Ors. v. State of A. P Read More »