Ram Kumar & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.(From: Rajasthan)
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 4 Civil Appeal Nos. 115-116 of 2001, D.29- 9-2008. Ram Kumar & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.(From: Rajasthan) (A) Civil P. C. (5 of 1908), S. 80- Non- service of notice under Effect -Land acquisition proceedings Transfer of land to plaintiff in lieu of his acquired land duly approved
Ram Kumar & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.(From: Rajasthan) Read More »
Case Title : A.K. Gopalan Case (1950)
Interesting Judgement Briefing Case Title : A.K. Gopalan Case (1950) Judges : Judges sitting : Harilal Kania (Chief Justice), S. Fazl Ali, M. Patanjali Sastri, Mehr Chand Mahajan, B.K. Mukherjea, Sudhi Ranjan Das. Decision by : Harilal Kania (Chief Justice) Dissent : S. Fazl Ali. Facts :▪️In this case, the appellant, A K Gopalan, commonly
Case Title : A.K. Gopalan Case (1950) Read More »
केस टाइटल :- प्रकाश चंद्र यादव बनाम झारखंड राज्य |सिविल अपील संख्या 4324/2023
÷÷÷÷÷÷ Legal Update ÷÷÷÷÷ ✴️सभी निवारक हिरासत कानून आवश्यक रूप से कठोर’: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने निवारक हिरासत मामलों में प्रक्रिया के सख्त पालन पर जोर दिया ====+====+====+====+==== ð£ झारखंड में निवारक हिरासत कानून के तहत एक व्यक्ति की निरंतर हिरासत के संबंध में दायर एक याचिका में, सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने निवारक हिरासत कानूनों से संबंधित
केस टाइटल :- प्रकाश चंद्र यादव बनाम झारखंड राज्य |सिविल अपील संख्या 4324/2023 Read More »
Parimal Vs. Veena @ Bharti, MANU/SC/0105/2011 : (2011) 3 SCC 345.
Restoration Court shall not set aside the ex parte decree on mere irregularity in the service of summons in a case where the defendant otherwise, had notice of the date of hearing and sufficient time to appear in the court. An ex parte decree against a defendant has to be set aside if the party
Parimal Vs. Veena @ Bharti, MANU/SC/0105/2011 : (2011) 3 SCC 345. Read More »
Chander Kanta Bansal v. Rajinder Singh Anand.
AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 2234 (From: Delhi) Civil Appeal No. 1893 of 2008 (arising out of SLP (C) No. 6892 of 2007),D.11-3-2008. Chander Kanta Bansal v. Rajinder Singh Anand. (A) Civil P. C. (5 of 1908), O. 6, R. 17, Proviso Amendment of pleadings Liberal principles guide exercise of discretion in allowing amendment But care
Chander Kanta Bansal v. Rajinder Singh Anand. Read More »
Wife Does Not Have The Right To Get Maintenance From Her Husband If She Willingly Leaves The Matrimonial Home: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has declined to grant maintenance to a woman who voluntarily left the matrimonial home. Justice Prashant Kumar’s bench, while hearing the case, said that it is clear from the provision of Section 125 (4) of CrPC that if a wife refuses to live with her husband, she has no right to
(LEADING CASE LAWS ON 489-F)…
(LEADING CASE LAWS ON 489-F) Dishonestly issuing a cheque……… Judgments of Supreme Court of Pakistan on S.489-F PPC 2017 SCMR 1944 SUPREME-COURT S. 497(5)—Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)—Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 489-F —Dishonestly issuing a cheque—Petition for cancellation of bail, dismissal of—Case had been instituted by the complainant after about three years, two
(LEADING CASE LAWS ON 489-F)… Read More »
Dr. Jaya Thakur Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Dr. Jaya Thakur Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 456 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1271 of 2021] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1274 of 2021] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1272 of 2021] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1307 of 2021] [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1330 of 2021] [Writ Petition (Civil) No.
Dr. Jaya Thakur Vs. Union of India & Ors. Read More »
