Uncategorized

Legal update 🅾️ मानहानि के कानून के बारे में जानें खास बातें 🟥मानहानि भी समाज की एक बड़ी समस्या है। व्यक्तियों,संस्था एवं कंपनी इत्यादि की समाज में बड़ी प्रतिष्ठा और साख़ होती है और ऐसी साख़ से व्यक्ति, संस्था या कंपनी आय भी अर्जित करती है। अब यदि किसी व्यक्ति द्वारा बगैर सबूतों और झूठे […]

📌📌Partition Partition Suit-Amendment of law before conclusion of the final decree proceedings Party benefitted by such amendment can make a request to the Trial Court to take cognizance of the Amendment and give effect to the same. R-Succession Hindu Succession-Conferred full rights upon the daughter coparcener No matter her father had died before the Amendment

*Jurisdiction-Territorial Jurisdiction-Suit for Injunction-One of the reliefs which relates to possession, may not fall under the proviso to section 16 of CPC-Plaint returned under Order 7 Rule 10 of CPC for presentation to proper territorial court. *Specific Relief Act, 1963-Sec. 37 and Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Sec. 16: Order VII Rule 10-Sult for Injunction-Territorial Jurisdiction-Return

Service matter Selection cannot be denied merely because the candidate has been named in a criminal matrimonial case. Merely Being Named In FIR On Matrimonial Offences Can’t Be Treated As Impediment For Public Appointment. “The abuse of the aforesaid provision has been substantially noticed though the salutary purpose of the enactment cannot be ignored in

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT State of KarnatakaVersusSajumon alias Saju Criminal Appellant No. 1266 of 2019, decided on 25.11.2019 PENAL CODE, 1860-Sections 302, 304-Circumstantial evidence Respondent reasonable doubt-On close reading of the materials, which have been produced before the Court below would clearly go to show that the entire case rests on circumstantial evidence. There are no

2019 (2) TLNJ 407 Rajeswari vs Kannan Date of Judgment: 30.04.2019 Hindu Marriage Act, Section 28 – Divorce by wife on the grounds of cruelty and desertion – alleging that husband not employed, borrowed all over the village and refused to heed the requirements of the appellant and children – Petition dismissed. In the appeal

2019 (3)CTC 596 Union of India Vs Parmar Construction Company Date of Judgment29-3-2019 Section 11 (6), 12(5), 21 &26 (As amended by Arbitration and conciliation Amendment) Act 2015 (3 of 2016) Retrospective application of 2015 Amendment Act to pending proceedings -When Maintainable 2015 Amendment Act came in to force on 23-102015 – The Amendment Act

2019(5) SCC 360 Vijay Hathising Shah and anr. Vs. Gitaben Parshottamdas Mukhi and ors. Date of Judgment : 25.02.2019 Application filed by the 1st respondent for amendment of plaint in the partition suit rejected by the trial court – High court allowed it by impugned order – On appeal it is Held that, the trial