🟥 ➡️ Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Enhancement of Compensation – Death in an Accident – No documentary evidence of income of victim – Without any documentary evidence of income, monthly income of more than Rs. 10,000/- can be presumed – Future Prospects are to be granted in compensation – Educated Major sons are also […]
🟨 ➡️ Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Compensation – Rash and negligent driving of the driver – Victim got injured – No documentary evidence of income of victim – Even if there is no documentary evidence of income of victim is there, income of more than Rs. 3700 per month can be presumed – Compensation
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Jitendra Nath Mishra vs State of U.P. & Anr Case No:- Criminal Appeal No. 978 of 2022 Date of Decision:- 02-06-2023 Dipankar Datta, Pankaj Mithal JJ HEADNOTE CRIMINAL LAWS Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 319 – Whether summoning order passed by Special Court under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA GHANSHYAM Vs. YOGENDRA RATHI — Respondent Civil Appeal Nos.7527-7528 of 2012 DATE OF DECISION:- 02-06-2023 HEADNOTE Transfer of Property Act, 1882 – Section 53A – Possessory rights of the prospective purchaser cannot be invaded by the transferer or any person claiming under him – Legally an agreement to sell may
2022(3) Kar. L.J. 136IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRAKASH AND OTHERSVersesSTATE OF KARNATAKA BY HOLALKERE POLICE STATION CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973, Sections 374(2), 313 and 233- Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 323 and 306 read with Section 34-Abetment of suicide – Ingredients of – Issue of motive to abet – Allegation
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 1133(From: 2006 (5) AIR Bom R 405:2006 Cri LJ (NOC) 456) Criminal Appeal Nos. 183 and 184 of 2007 (arising out of SLP (Cri.) Nos. 4600 and 4603 of 2006),D/ 9-1-2007. Dattatray Krishnaji Ghule v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.ANDHitendra Manohar Vichare v. State of Maharashtra. Criminal P. C. (2 of
AIR 2007 SUPREME COURT 1160(From: Madras)* Civil Appeal No. 6196 of 2000, D/18-1-2007. Krishnananda v. Kattu Siva Ashram & Ors. Civil P. C. (5 of 1908), S. 100-Second appeal Tenability Suit for declaration of title Appellant was one of defendants in suit Suit dismissed Appellant’s claim for title by adverse possession rejected by trial Court
÷÷÷÷÷ Legal Update ÷÷÷÷÷ 🅾️इलाहाबाद हाई कोर्ट ने एक अहम फैसला दिया है, जिसमें नाबालिग को भी पूर्व जमानत का अधिकार है। ====+====+====+====+==== 🟫किसी भी मामले में गिरफ्तारी या गिरफ्तारी की आशंका होने पर नाबालिग भी अग्रिम जमानत के लिए आवेदन कर सकता है।यह मुख्य न्यायाधीश प्रीतिंकर दिवाकर और मिश्रित समित गोपाल की खंडपीठ ने
Divorce. Derogatory remarks in WS by wife against husband amounts to cruelty. Derogatory remarks in WSa conscious and deliberate statement levelled with pungency and that too placed on record, through the written statement, cannot be so lightly ignored or brushed aside. In Vijaykumar Ramchandra Bhate v. Neela Vijaykumar Bhate [MANU/SC/0316/2003 : (2003) 6 SCC 334
Case law Sec. 80— Sec. 80, though a procedural provision, has been held to be mandatory as it is conceived in public interest, the public purpose underlying it being the advancement of justice by giving the Government the opportunity to scrutinize and take immediate action to settle a just claim without driving the person who
