Uncategorized

⚖️👉सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने कावेरी प्लास्टिक्स द्वारा दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट के एक आदेश के खिलाफ दायर अपील को खारिज कर करते हुए कहा है किधारा 138 एनआई एक्ट के तहत नोटिस अमान्य यदि चेक राशि का सटीक उल्लेख नहीं; टाइपिंग की गलती बचाव का आधार नहीं: सुप्रीम कोर्ट सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने परक्राम्य लिखत अधिनियम, 1881 (Negotiable Instruments […]

Minor The Family Court has no jurisdiction to decide the question of the appointment of the guardian about the property of the minor. If an application is there for joint prayer for appointment of guardian for person and property of minor even that applications to be decided by District Judge and not by Family Court.

Minor. Residence of mother is deemed to be the place of residence of the minor. The word “ordinarily resides” came for consideration by this Court in AIR 1956 All 328 Smt. Kamla v. Bhanu Mal where it was held that where the mother leaves the place where she had been residing as a permanent resident

⚖️👉 वकील के खिलाफ बेबुनियाद शिकायत पर सुनवाई के लिए महाराष्ट्र एवं गोवा बार काउंसिल पर 50,000 रुपये का जुर्माना लगाया👉 Case Title – Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa v. Rajiv Nareshchandra Narula and Ors. सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने बुधवार (24 सितंबर) को एक वकील के खिलाफ बेबुनियाद शिकायत पर सुनवाई के लिए महाराष्ट्र एवं

🏛️ PUNJAB HARYANA HIGH COURT ALKA SARIN, J Motor Vehicles Act, Compensation – Interest on enhanced compensation amount – Enhanced amount to attract interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization – Directions issued for investment of compensation amount in FDR to safeguard the interest of the

Supreme Court upholds service tax on Airport Authority’s export cargo handling. The Court held that while handling export cargo is excluded from the definition of “cargo handling service,” it is still a “taxable service” under the broader category of “airport services” provided by the Airports Authority, and is therefore liable to service tax. Court:Supreme Court

Supreme Court axes High Court’s order for third judicial exam, backs original recruitment process. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s review order, holding that the High Court exceeded its review jurisdiction by reconsidering matters already decided and directing a fresh main exam. The recruitment process will continue without further delay. Court:Supreme Court of

Supreme Court slams door on borrower’s second attempt to challenge loan recovery. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals as not maintainable, holding that a second special leave petition is barred when the first was withdrawn without seeking liberty to file a fresh one. The Court emphasized that such a practice is against public policy and

Arbitration.Objection under section 47 CPC can be filed to show that award is nullity irrespective kof fact that no objection under section 34 was filed. Objection to execution of an award under Section 47 CPC is not dependent or contingent upon filing a petition under Section 34 of the 1996 Act. High Court was not