Uncategorized

• Civil Contempt action ought to proceed only in respect of established wilful disobedience of the order of the Court Thus, in order to punish a contemnor, it has to be established that disobedience of the order is wilful Word wilful ntroduces a mental element and hence, requires looking into the mind of a person/contemnor […]

(2016) 3 MLJ (Crl) 116 (SC) R. Rachaiah vs. Home Secretary, Bangalore Date of Judgment : 05.05.2016 Charge – Alteration of Charge – Recall of Witnesses – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Code 1973), Sections 216 and 217 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Code 1860), Sections 302, 306, 364, 365 and 34 – Appellants/accused charged

(2016) 5 MLJ 535 (SC) Sundaram Finance Limited vs. Noorjahan Beevi Date of Judgment : 29.06.2016 Limitation – Agreement – Bar of Limitation – Limitation Act, 1963 (Act 1963), Articles 55 and 113 – Appellant/Plaintiff/Finance company and First Defendant had entered into agreement – First Defendant/hirer was to clear off entire amount due in monthly

Suit filed against a dead person.It is a curable defect. Legal heirs can be impleaded. When a suit is instituted against a sole dead person, the plaintiff can seek for impleadment/substitution of proper parties. Provided he satisfies the Court that the mistake in filing the suit was made in good faith and not on account

Aish Mohammad Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 4044 of 2023 @ SLP (Civil) No. 12248 of 2023 @ Diary No. 23042 of 2011] R1: State of Haryana R2: Director General of Police (Haryana), Panchkula R3: Inspector General of Police, Gurgaon R4: Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurgaon R5: Inspector General of Police,

(((LEADING CASE LAWS ON 489-F))) Dishonestly issuing a cheque……… Judgments of Supreme Court of Pakistan on S.489-F PPC 2017 SCMR 1944 SUPREME-COURT S. 497(5)—Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)—Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 489-F —Dishonestly issuing a cheque—Petition for cancellation of bail, dismissal of—Case had been instituted by the complainant after about three years, two

Important Guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the Landmark Judgement of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation on 11.07.2022 The courts will have to satisfy themselves on the compliance of Sections 41 and 41A of the Code. Any non-compliance would entitle the accused to grant bail i.e. if the police authorities

⭐ SC: Forged NOC to get electricity connection – Authorities failed to see if Applicant accused were in possession or not, HC overlooked the definition of cheating – HC order quashing the FIR is set aside. S.482-Quashing of FIR-Offence of cheating – Allegations that accused allegedly fabricated NO OBJECTION certificate for supply of electricity in

LEGAL UPDATE एनडीपीएस एक्ट की धारा 36A(4) – 180 दिनों की वैधानिक अवधि के बाद अभियुक्त की हिरासत के लिए लोक अभियोजक की रिपोर्ट अनिवार्य : पी एंड एच हाईकोर्ट ⚫ पंजाब एंड हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट ने हाल ही में माना कि नारकोटिक ड्रग्स एंड साइकोट्रॉपिक सबस्टेंस एक्ट, 1985 की धारा 36-ए (4) के अनुसार जांच