Uncategorized

NI ActSection 138..Lakhani Builders Pvt. Ltd & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan, Through PP & Anr…

NI ActSection 138.. The primary concern would be the recovery of money since the conviction of an accused serves no significant purpose. The punishment on the drawer for a dishonoured cheque is secondary as far as Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is concerned. The court while quashing the entire criminal proceedings pending against […]

NI ActSection 138..Lakhani Builders Pvt. Ltd & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan, Through PP & Anr… Read More »

NI ACT 138..JAY NARAYAN vs State of Gujarat CRMA 14266/22 16/02/24 [ NISHA JJ ] [ GUJARAT HIGH COURT ]…

• NI ACT Section 138 Cheque bounce The applicant is the original complainant who had lent Rs. 15,00,000 to the respondent, the original accused, and received three cheques in return, which were dishonoured by the bank The trial court had convicted the respondent and sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and a fine of

NI ACT 138..JAY NARAYAN vs State of Gujarat CRMA 14266/22 16/02/24 [ NISHA JJ ] [ GUJARAT HIGH COURT ]… Read More »

Section 438 CRPC PMLA ACT…DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT VERSUS BABLU SONKAR SLPCRL 16226/23 09/02/24 [ OKA JJ ] [ SUPREME COURT ]…

• Section 438 CRPC PMLA ACT Roster notified by the Chief Justice is not an empty formality Writ pending before a bench transferred to another bench After releasing the case, when even there was no prayer made by the respondent for grant of bail the Bench granted bail for releasing the first respondent Even during

Section 438 CRPC PMLA ACT…DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT VERSUS BABLU SONKAR SLPCRL 16226/23 09/02/24 [ OKA JJ ] [ SUPREME COURT ]… Read More »

Roopshree HR vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. Right to defend oneself a fundamental right: Supreme Court rejects Bar Association’s proposal not to represent any party…

Right to defend oneself a fundamental right: Supreme Court rejects Bar Association’s proposal not to represent any party Case Title: Roopshree HR vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. The Supreme Court has quashed the resolution passed by the Mysore Bar Association in which it had resolved not to file Vakalatnama or appear on behalf of

Roopshree HR vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. Right to defend oneself a fundamental right: Supreme Court rejects Bar Association’s proposal not to represent any party… Read More »

Dr. Mrs. Suman V. Jain Vs. Marwadi Sammelan through its Secretary and Ors.[Civil Appeal No. 1480 of 2012]J.K. Maheshwari J…

Dr. Mrs. Suman V. Jain Vs. Marwadi Sammelan through its Secretary and Ors.[Civil Appeal No. 1480 of 2012]J.K. Maheshwari J.1. The instant appeal arises out of the judgment dated 04.07.2008, passed by the Division Bench of the ‘High Court of Judicature at Bombay’ in Appeal No. 63 of 2008, whereby the Division Bench dismissed the

Dr. Mrs. Suman V. Jain Vs. Marwadi Sammelan through its Secretary and Ors.[Civil Appeal No. 1480 of 2012]J.K. Maheshwari J… Read More »

Ramanand Gunaji Amonkar and others v. Raghuvir Shamba Amonkar…

AIR 2024 BOMBAY 21BOMBAY HIGH COURT(GOA BENCH) Ramanand Gunaji Amonkar and others v. Raghuvir Shamba Amonkar. Second Appeal 45 of 2010, D.6-11-2023. 📌Specific Relief Act (47 of 1963), S.38 Suit for permanent injunction Settled possession Concept of – Plaintiff’s case that he was put in possession of suit shop in pursuance of family settlement deed

Ramanand Gunaji Amonkar and others v. Raghuvir Shamba Amonkar… Read More »

DelhiControl Act…. SUNIL vs NASEEM 2107/23 19/02/24 [ SHALINDER JJ ] [ DELHI HIGH COURT ]

• Delhi Rent Control Act Section 14(1)(e) Eviction petition The petitioner challenges the order of the Rent Controller that dismissed his application to be impleaded as a party in an eviction petition filed by the respondent no.1, against the respondent no.2, who is the petitioner’s brother and one of the legal heirs of their deceased

DelhiControl Act…. SUNIL vs NASEEM 2107/23 19/02/24 [ SHALINDER JJ ] [ DELHI HIGH COURT ] Read More »